Literature DB >> 12635512

Corticospinal volleys evoked by transcranial stimulation of the brain in conscious humans.

Vincenzo Di Lazzaro1, Antonio Oliviero, Fabio Pilato, Paolo Mazzone, Angelo Insola, Federico Ranieri, Pietro A Tonali.   

Abstract

The direct recording in conscious humans of corticospinal volleys evoked by different magnetic and electric techniques of transcranial stimulation demonstrates that it is possible to activate neurones of the motor cortex in several different ways. Lateral electrical stimulation of the motor cortex preferentially activates the axons of corticospinal neurones in the subcortical white matter, and evokes a D-wave in pyramidal tract. The way of activation of corticospinal neurones using magnetic stimulation depends on the direction of the electrical current induced in the brain and on the shape of the coil. Monophasic magnetic stimulation with a focal figure-of-eight coil inducing posterior-anterior current in the brain activates corticospinal neurones trans-synaptically recruiting an 11-wave, with later I-waves appearing in sequence at higher intensities and a D-wave at very high intensities. If the induced current is rotated to the anterior-posterior direction late I-waves are preferentially recruited and when a D-wave is recruited, it has a later onset than the electrical D-wave, suggesting an activation nearer the cell body of the pyramidal neurones. A latero-medial induced current activates both corticospinal axons at the same point as electrical stimulation evoking a D wave and cortico-cortical axons evoking I-waves. A nonfocal large circular coil centered at the vertex is capable of activating pyramidal neurones both at the initial segment and trans-synaptically evoking a D wave with a longer latency than the electrical D-wave and I-waves. Using a biphasic magnetic stimulation, both phases of the biphasic pulse are capable of activating descending motor output and the pattern of recruitment of descending activity depends on the intensity of the stimulus and the relative threshold of each volley to each direction of current flow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12635512     DOI: 10.1179/016164103101201292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Res        ISSN: 0161-6412            Impact factor:   2.448


  15 in total

1.  Correlation between motor and phosphene thresholds: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Choi Deblieck; Benjamin Thompson; Marco Iacoboni; Allan D Wu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Differential Poststroke Motor Recovery in an Arm Versus Hand Muscle in the Absence of Motor Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Heidi M Schambra; Jing Xu; Meret Branscheidt; Martin Lindquist; Jasim Uddin; Levke Steiner; Benjamin Hertler; Nathan Kim; Jessica Berard; Michelle D Harran; Juan C Cortes; Tomoko Kitago; Andreas Luft; John W Krakauer; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Aftereffects of Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation in Adjacent, Non-Target Muscles.

Authors:  Timothy P Morris; Paula Davila-Pérez; Ali Jannati; Arianna Menardi; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Peter J Fried
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 4.  A practical guide to diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee.

Authors:  S Groppa; A Oliviero; A Eisen; A Quartarone; L G Cohen; V Mall; A Kaelin-Lang; T Mima; S Rossi; G W Thickbroom; P M Rossini; U Ziemann; J Valls-Solé; H R Siebner
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Inhibitory and excitatory intracortical circuits across the human sleep-wake cycle using paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  F Salih; R Khatami; S Steinheimer; O Hummel; A Kühn; P Grosse
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 6.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Assessment of Neurodegenerative Disease.

Authors:  Steve Vucic; Matthew C Kiernan
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.620

7.  The effect of paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation on maximal voluntary elbow flexion in cervical spinal cord injury: an experimental study.

Authors:  Siobhan C Dongés; Claire L Boswell-Ruys; Jane E Butler; Janet L Taylor
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 2.772

8.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies of visuospatial attentional control.

Authors:  Sara M Szczepanski; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  F1000 Biol Rep       Date:  2009-10-29

9.  The Effects of Waveform and Current Direction on the Efficacy and Test-Retest Reliability of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Paula Davila-Pérez; Ali Jannati; Peter J Fried; Javier Cudeiro Mazaira; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  The TMS Map Scales with Increased Stimulation Intensity and Muscle Activation.

Authors:  Mark van de Ruit; Michael J Grey
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.