Literature DB >> 12634488

Alpha and beta oscillatory changes during stimulus-induced movement paradigms: effect of stimulus predictability.

Manuel Alegre1, Iñaki G Gurtubay, Alberto Labarga, Jorge Iriarte, Armando Malanda, Julio Artieda.   

Abstract

We studied the effect of stimulus predictability on the alpha and beta changes observed in central regions during stimulus-induced movement paradigms. Six young volunteers were instructed to extend briskly their dominant wrist as soon as possible after hearing a 2000 Hz sound. Two sequences of stimuli were presented to each subject, the first rhythmic at 1/6 s and the second with random intervals between 5 and 13s. A time-frequency analysis of nonphase-locked activity in the 7-37 Hz range was performed on stimulus-centred EEG sweeps using wavelet filters and Gabor transforms. During the sequence of predictable rhythmic stimuli, stimulus-induced movements were accompanied by a decrease in beta activity that began contralaterally about 1 s prior to the stimulus and extended to both sides later on. This decrease was followed by a rebound after the end of the movement. In the alpha band, the decrease observed started just after the sound. During the sequence of non-predictable, random stimuli, stimulus-induced movements were accompanied by a shorter and smaller alpha and beta-ERD, that started after the stimulus. The presence of a pre-stimulus beta ERD only in the rhythmic predictable paradigm suggests that central pre-movement beta ERD may be an indicator of motor preparation, and could be used for objective evaluation of time estimation and motor timing. The minimal differences observed in the alpha changes in both paradigms suggest that alpha-ERD may not be linked to motor preparation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12634488     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200303030-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  31 in total

1.  Frontal and central oscillatory changes related to different aspects of the motor process: a study in go/no-go paradigms.

Authors:  M Alegre; I G Gurtubay; A Labarga; J Iriarte; M Valencia; J Artieda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Cortical gamma activity during auditory tone omission provides evidence for the involvement of oscillatory activity in top-down processing.

Authors:  I G Gurtubay; M Alegre; M Valencia; J Artieda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Centrifugal regulation of a task-relevant somatosensory signal triggering voluntary movement without a preceding warning signal.

Authors:  Tetsuo Kida; Toshiaki Wasaka; Hiroki Nakata; Kosuke Akatsuka; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  EEG Mu (µ) rhythm spectra and oscillatory activity differentiate stuttering from non-stuttering adults.

Authors:  Tim Saltuklaroglu; Ashley W Harkrider; David Thornton; David Jenson; Tiffani Kittilstved
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Age-related changes in the bimanual advantage and in brain oscillatory activity during tapping movements suggest a decline in processing sensory reafference.

Authors:  Etienne Sallard; Lucas Spierer; Catherine Ludwig; Marie-Pierre Deiber; Jérôme Barral
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Developmental Trajectory of Beta Cortical Oscillatory Activity During a Knee Motor Task.

Authors:  Max J Kurz; Amy L Proskovec; James E Gehringer; Katherine M Becker; David J Arpin; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Adaptation to constant-magnitude assistive forces: kinematic and neural correlates.

Authors:  Vladimir Novakovic; Vittorio Sanguineti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Oscillatory correlates of controlled speed-accuracy tradeoff in a response-conflict task.

Authors:  Bernhard Pastötter; Franziska Berchtold; Karl-Heinz T Bäuml
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Evidence for a motor gamma-band network governing response interference.

Authors:  W Gaetz; C Liu; H Zhu; L Bloy; T P L Roberts
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Neurophysiological abnormalities in the sensorimotor cortices during the motor planning and movement execution stages of children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Max J Kurz; Katherine M Becker; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 5.449

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.