Literature DB >> 21305377

Adaptation to constant-magnitude assistive forces: kinematic and neural correlates.

Vladimir Novakovic1, Vittorio Sanguineti.   

Abstract

In many robot-assisted rehabilitation and motor skill learning applications, robots generate forces that facilitate movement performance. While there is some evidence that assistance is beneficial, the underlying mechanisms of action are largely unknown, and it is unclear what force patterns are more effective. Here, we investigate how reaching movements (and their neural correlates) are altered by 'assistive' forces. Subjects performed center-out reaching movements, under the influence of a robot-generated force, constant in magnitude and always directed toward the target. The experimental protocol included three phases: (1) baseline (no forces), (2) force field (with two different force levels, 3 N and 6 N, applied in random order), and (3) after-effect (no forces). EEG activity was recorded from motor and frontal cortical areas. In both movement kinematics and EEG activity, we looked at the effects of forces, of adaptation to such forces and at the aftereffects of such adaptation. Assistive forces initially induced a degraded performance and in general alterations in movement kinematics. However, subjects quickly adapted to the perturbation by improving their performance. With regard to EEG activity, we found (1) an increased beta band synchronization just before movements and an alpha band synchronization in the ipsilateral hemisphere, both proportional to force magnitude; (2) a gradual decrease in alpha band synchronization with practice in the contralateral hemisphere; (3) an increase in theta band synchronization in the later stage of the force epochs; and (4) an ipsilateral to contralateral shift (from baseline to aftereffect) of theta band synchronization. These results point to the need for a careful design of assistive forces to effectively facilitate motor performance and motor learning. Moreover, EEG signals exhibit distinct features related to force and adaptation. Therefore, at least in principle, the latter might be used to monitor the learning process and/or to regulate the amount of assistance.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21305377     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2573-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  46 in total

Review 1.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles.

Authors:  G Pfurtscheller; F H Lopes da Silva
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  The effects of imagery perspective as a function of skill level on alpha activity.

Authors:  Juan Gualberto Cremades
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Movement-related EEG potentials are force or end-effector dependent: evidence from a multi-finger experiment.

Authors:  S Slobounov; J Johnston; H Chiang; W Ray
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Minimally assistive robot training for proprioception enhancement.

Authors:  Maura Casadio; Pietro Morasso; Vittorio Sanguineti; Psiche Giannoni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Movement-related desynchronization of alpha rhythms is lower in athletes than non-athletes: a high-resolution EEG study.

Authors:  Claudio Del Percio; Francesco Infarinato; Marco Iacoboni; Nicola Marzano; Andrea Soricelli; Pierluigi Aschieri; Fabrizio Eusebi; Claudio Babiloni
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Mechanisms underlying functional changes in the primary motor cortex ipsilateral to an active hand.

Authors:  Monica A Perez; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Brain biomarkers of motor adaptation using phase synchronization.

Authors:  Rodolphe J Gentili; Trent J Bradberry; Bradley D Hatfield; Jose L Contreras-Vidal
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

8.  Patient-cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results.

Authors:  Robert Riener; Lars Lünenburger; Saso Jezernik; Martin Anderschitz; Gery Colombo; Volker Dietz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  High-resolution EEG mapping of cortical activation related to working memory: effects of task difficulty, type of processing, and practice.

Authors:  A Gevins; M E Smith; L McEvoy; D Yu
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution.

Authors:  A J Bell; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.026

View more
  5 in total

1.  Motor learning with fading and growing haptic guidance.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Jenna Lüttgen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Neurophysiology of robot-mediated training and therapy: a perspective for future use in clinical populations.

Authors:  Duncan L Turner; Ander Ramos-Murguialday; Niels Birbaumer; Ulrich Hoffmann; Andreas Luft
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 4.003

3.  Haptic Guidance Needs to Be Intuitive Not Just Informative to Improve Human Motor Accuracy.

Authors:  Winfred Mugge; Irene A Kuling; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Ipsilateral EEG mu rhythm reflects the excitability of uncrossed pathways projecting to shoulder muscles.

Authors:  Keita Hasegawa; Shoko Kasuga; Kenichi Takasaki; Katsuhiro Mizuno; Meigen Liu; Junichi Ushiba
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  The level of performance stabilization influences motor adaptation on an isometric force control task.

Authors:  Suziane Peixoto Dos Santos; Rodolfo N Benda; Crislaine Rangel Couto; Carlos Eduardo Campos; André Gustavo Pereira Andrade; Guilherme M Lage; Herbert Ugrinowitsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.