Literature DB >> 12633547

The EuroHeart Failure Survey programme--a survey on the quality of care among patients with heart failure in Europe. Part 2: treatment.

M Komajda, F Follath, K Swedberg, J Cleland, J C Aguilar, A Cohen-Solal, R Dietz, A Gavazzi, W H Van Gilst, R Hobbs, J Korewicki, H C Madeira, V S Moiseyev, I Preda, J Widimsky, N Freemantle, J Eastaugh, J Mason.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: National surveys suggest that treatment of heart failure in daily practice differs from guidelines and is characterized by underuse of recommended medications. Accordingly, the Euro Heart Failure Survey was conducted to ascertain how patients hospitalized for heart failure are managed in Europe and if national variations occur in the treatment of this condition.
METHODS: The survey screened discharge summaries of 11304 patients over a 6-week period in 115 hospitals from 24 countries belonging to the ESC to study their medical treatment.
RESULTS: Diuretics (mainly loop diuretics) were prescribed in 86.9% followed by ACE inhibitors (61.8%), beta-blockers (36.9%), cardiac glycosides (35.7%), nitrates (32.1%), calcium channel blockers (21.2%) and spironolactone (20.5%). 44.6% of the population used four or more different drugs. Only 17.2% were under the combination of diuretic, ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers. Important local variations were found in the rate of prescription of ACE inhibitors and particularly beta-blockers. Daily dosage of ACE inhibitors and particularly of beta-blockers was on average below the recommended target dose. Modelling-analysis of the prescription of treatments indicated that the aetiology of heart failure, age, co-morbid factors and type of hospital ward influenced the rate of prescription. Age <70 years, male gender and ischaemic aetiology were associated with an increased odds ratio for receiving an ACE inhibitor. Prescription of ACE inhibitors was also greater in diabetic patients and in patients with low ejection fraction (<40%) and lower in patients with renal dysfunction. The odds ratio for receiving a beta-blocker was reduced in patients >70 years, in patients with respiratory disease and increased in cardiology wards, in ischaemic heart failure and in male subjects. Prescription of cardiac glycosides was significantly increased in patients with supraventricular tachycardia/atrial fibrillation. Finally, the rate of prescription of antithrombotic agents was increased in the presence of supraventricular arrhythmia, ischaemic heart disease, male subjects but was decreased in patients over 70.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the prescription of recommended medications including ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers remains limited and that the daily dosage remains low, particularly for beta-blockers. The survey also identifies several important factors including age, gender, type of hospital ward, co morbid factors which influence the prescription of heart failure medication at discharge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12633547     DOI: 10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00700-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  132 in total

1.  Ivabradine in heart failure: to SHIFT or not to SHIFT.

Authors:  Andres Schuster; W H Wilson Tang
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2011-03

Review 2.  Administrative data have high variation in validity for recording heart failure.

Authors:  Susan Quach; Claudia Blais; Hude Quan
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  Multidisciplinary interventions in heart failure.

Authors:  A L Clark; J G F Cleland
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Gender and heart failure: a population perspective.

Authors:  P A Mehta; M R Cowie
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is an independent predictor of death but not atherosclerotic events in patients with myocardial infarction: analysis of the Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial (VALIANT).

Authors:  Nathaniel M Hawkins; Zhen Huang; Karen S Pieper; Scott D Solomon; Lars Kober; Eric J Velazquez; Karl Swedberg; Marc A Pfeffer; John J V McMurray; Aldo P Maggioni
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 15.534

6.  International differences in clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes in acute heart failure patients: better short-term outcomes in patients enrolled in Eastern Europe and Russia in the PROTECT trial.

Authors:  Robert J Mentz; Gad Cotter; John G F Cleland; Susanna R Stevens; Karen Chiswell; Beth A Davison; John R Teerlink; Marco Metra; Adriaan A Voors; Liliana Grinfeld; Mikhail Ruda; Viacheslav Mareev; Chaim Lotan; Daniel M Bloomfield; Mona Fiuzat; Michael M Givertz; Piotr Ponikowski; Barry M Massie; Christopher M O'Connor
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 15.534

7.  Structure and markers of appropriateness, quality and performance of drug treatment over a 1-year period after hospital discharge in a cohort of elderly patients with cardiovascular diseases from Germany.

Authors:  Sebastian Harder; Philipp Fischer; Markus Krause-Schäfer; Klaus Ostermann; Gottfried Helms; Helge Prinz; Mike Hahmann; Horst Baas
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Improving evidence based cardiac care and policy implementation over the patient journey: the potential of coronary heart disease registers.

Authors:  A M Clark; I N Findlay
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Effects of candesartan cilexetil "add-on" treatment in congestive heart failure outpatients in daily practice.

Authors:  Veselin Mitrovic; Karl-Friedrich Appel; Nicolaos Proskynitopoulos; Seyfettin Dereli; Christian Wilhelm Hamm
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 10.  Is heart failure different on the two continents (North America and Europe)?

Authors:  Rachel Hughes-Doichev; Mark E Dunlap
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.