Literature DB >> 12631501

The relative-reinforcing value of food under differing levels of food deprivation and restriction.

Hollie A Raynor1, Leonard H Epstein.   

Abstract

Food deprivation and restriction both increase food consumption. Food deprivation also increases the reinforcing value of food, but it is unknown if food restriction alone or combined with deprivation increases the reinforcing value of food. Forty, normal-weight, college-aged, unrestrained females were randomized to one of four conditions that crossed food deprivation (Dep) and restriction (Res): Dep/Res, Dep/No Res, No Dep/Res, No Dep/No Res. All participants arrived at least 13h food-deprived, and non-deprived participants consumed at least 365cal from a drink during the session. Restriction was manipulated by placing snack food in front of participants, without access for 15min during the session, or having no snack food placed in front of participants. Following the experimental manipulations, participants completed a computer choice task to determine the reinforcing value of food. Repeated measures analysis of variance found a significant main effect of deprivation (p<0.05) and trials (p<0.001) for food points earned. Deprived participants found food to be more reinforcing, and the reinforcing value of food decreased over time. This suggests that while short-term food deprivation increases the relative-reinforcing value of food, short-term food restriction has no effect on the relative-reinforcing value of food in unrestrained eaters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12631501     DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6663(02)00161-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  49 in total

Review 1.  Hunger and BMI modulate neural responses to sweet stimuli: fMRI meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eunice Y Chen; Thomas A Zeffiro
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 5.095

2.  A sipometer for measuring motivation to consume and reward value of foods and beverages in humans: Description and proof of principle.

Authors:  P S Hogenkamp; A Shechter; M-P St-Onge; A Sclafani; H R Kissileff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-01-13

3.  Food reinforcement and obesity. Psychological moderators.

Authors:  Leonard H Epstein; Henry Lin; Katelyn A Carr; Kelly D Fletcher
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 4.  Food reinforcement and eating: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Leonard H Epstein; John J Leddy; Jennifer L Temple; Myles S Faith
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Overweight children find food more reinforcing and consume more energy than do nonoverweight children.

Authors:  Jennifer L Temple; Christina M Legierski; April M Giacomelli; Sarah-Jeanne Salvy; Leonard H Epstein
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  FTO polymorphisms moderate the association of food reinforcement with energy intake.

Authors:  Jennifer L Scheid; Katelyn A Carr; Henry Lin; Kelly D Fletcher; Lara Sucheston; Prashant K Singh; Robbert Salis; Richard W Erbe; Myles S Faith; David B Allison; Leonard H Epstein
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-04-24

7.  Making access to TV contingent on physical activity: effects on liking and relative reinforcing value of TV and physical activity in overweight and obese children.

Authors:  Gary S Goldfield
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2011-02-23

8.  Are dietary restraint scales valid measures of dietary restriction? Additional objective behavioral and biological data suggest not.

Authors:  Eric Stice; Robyn Sysko; Christina A Roberto; Shelley Allison
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.868

9.  Factors influencing the reinforcing value of fruit and unhealthy snacks.

Authors:  L Vervoort; A Clauwaert; L Vandeweghe; J Vangeel; W Van Lippevelde; L Goossens; L Huybregts; C Lachat; S Eggermont; K Beullens; C Braet; N De Cock
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 10.  Homeostatic regulation of reward via synaptic insertion of calcium-permeable AMPA receptors in nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Kenneth D Carr
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2020-02-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.