Literature DB >> 12630476

Influence of wettability and saturation on liquid-liquid interfacial area in porous media.

Vivek Jain1, Steven Bryant, Mukul Sharma.   

Abstract

The knowledge of the area of interfaces between phases is important to understand and quantify many flow and transport processes in porous media. In this work, we apply the interfacial tracer technique to study the dependence of fluid-fluid interfacial area on saturation and wettability. The interfacial area between the wetting and the nonwetting phases (brine and decane) in unconsolidated porous media (glass beads) was measured using an anionic surfactant (3-phenyl decyl benzene sulfonate) as an interfacial tracer. The beads are water-wet; treating them with organosilane rendered them oil-wet. The measurements were done at a series of steady-state fractional flows, providing data at intermediate as well as residual saturations. Flow rates were kept low so that capillary forces controlled the fluid configurations. We observe significant differences in interfacial areas as a function of wetting-phase saturation as the wettability is changed from water-wet to oil-wet. During primary drainage, measured interfacial area increases monotonically with decreasing water saturation in a water-wet medium. In contrast, the interfacial area measured in the oil-wet porous medium increases with decreasing decane saturation, reaches a maximum, and decreases as the residual decane saturation is achieved. The oil-wet experiment is qualitatively consistent with theoretical results that predict the existence of a maximum in fluid-fluid interfacial area during drainage. The water-wet experiment is consistent with theoretical predictions that include the area of grains in pores that have been drained. We conclude that, in the water-wet experiments, the tracer adsorbs at the interface between the nonwetting phase and the wetting films on grains. In the oil-wet experiments, either the oil films are not sustained at high water saturation or the tracer does not adsorb at them, possibly prevented by steric hindrance. Interpretation of interfacial tracer experiments therefore requires care: for some mass transport processes, the thin films of wetting phase on grains will not behave the same as macroscopic volumes of wetting phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12630476     DOI: 10.1021/es020550s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  7 in total

1.  The two-phase flow IPTT method for measurement of nonwetting-wetting liquid interfacial areas at higher nonwetting saturations in natural porous media.

Authors:  Hua Zhong; Asma El Ouni; Dan Lin; Bingguo Wang; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2016-07-24       Impact factor: 5.240

2.  COMPARISON OF INTERFACIAL PARTITIONING TRACER TEST AND HIGH-RESOLUTION MICROTOMOGRAPHY MEASUREMENTS OF FLUID-FLUID INTERFACIAL AREAS FOR AN IDEAL POROUS MEDIUM.

Authors:  Matt Narter; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.240

3.  NAPL-water interfacial area as a function of fluid saturation measured with the interfacial partitioning tracer test method.

Authors:  M L Brusseau; H Taghap
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  The Gas-absorption/Chemical-reaction Method for Measuring Air-water Interfacial Area in Natural Porous Media.

Authors:  Ying Lyu; Mark L Brusseau; Asma El Ouni; Juliana B Araujo; Xiaosi Su
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 5.240

5.  Comparison of Fluid-Fluid Interfacial Areas Measured with X-ray Microtomography and Interfacial Partitioning Tracer Tests for the same Samples.

Authors:  Kieran McDonald; Kenneth C Carroll; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 5.240

6.  Interfacial partitioning tracer test measurements of organic-liquid/water interfacial areas: application to soils and the influence of surface roughness.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Matt Narter; Hilary Janousek
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  SYNCHROTRON X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY AND INTERFACIAL PARTITIONING TRACER TEST MEASUREMENTS OF NAPL-WATER INTERFACIAL AREAS.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Hilary Janousek; Asami Murao; Gregory Schnaar
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.