K Ball1, G D Mishra, D Crawford. 1. School of Health Sciences, Deakin University, Australia. kball@deakin.edu.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated a behavioural model of the relation between social factors and obesity, in which differences in body mass index (BMI) across sociodemographic groups were hypothesized to be attributable to social group differences in health behaviours affecting energy expenditure (physical activity, diet and alcohol consumption and weight control). METHODS: A total of 8667 adults who participated in the 1995 Australian National Health and Nutrition Surveys provided data on a range of health factors including objectively measured height and weight, health behaviours, and social factors including family status, employment status, housing situation and migration status. RESULTS: Social factors remained significant predictors of BMI after controlling for all health behaviours. Neither social factors alone, nor health behaviours alone, adequately explained the variance in BMI. Gender-specific interactions were found between social factors and individual health behaviours. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that social factors moderate the relation between BMI and weight-related behaviours, and that the mechanisms underlying sociodemographic group differences in obesity may vary among men and women. Additional factors are likely to act in conjunction with current health behaviours to explain variation in obesity prevalence across sociodemographic groups.
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated a behavioural model of the relation between social factors and obesity, in which differences in body mass index (BMI) across sociodemographic groups were hypothesized to be attributable to social group differences in health behaviours affecting energy expenditure (physical activity, diet and alcohol consumption and weight control). METHODS: A total of 8667 adults who participated in the 1995 Australian National Health and Nutrition Surveys provided data on a range of health factors including objectively measured height and weight, health behaviours, and social factors including family status, employment status, housing situation and migration status. RESULTS: Social factors remained significant predictors of BMI after controlling for all health behaviours. Neither social factors alone, nor health behaviours alone, adequately explained the variance in BMI. Gender-specific interactions were found between social factors and individual health behaviours. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that social factors moderate the relation between BMI and weight-related behaviours, and that the mechanisms underlying sociodemographic group differences in obesity may vary among men and women. Additional factors are likely to act in conjunction with current health behaviours to explain variation in obesity prevalence across sociodemographic groups.
Authors: Nancy A Ross; Stephane Tremblay; Saeeda Khan; Daniel Crouse; Mark Tremblay; Jean-Marie Berthelot Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-01-31 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Karen Hosper; Mary Nicolaou; Irene van Valkengoed; Vera Nierkens; Karien Stronks Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-02-16 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: T E Dorner; W J Stronegger; K Hoffmann; K Viktoria Stein; T Niederkrotenthaler Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Nattinee Jitnarin; Vongsvat Kosulwat; Nipa Rojroongwasinkul; Atitada Boonpraderm; Christopher K Haddock; Walker S C Poston Journal: Nutrients Date: 2010-01-21 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: María José García-Mendizábal; José Miguel Carrasco; Beatriz Pérez-Gómez; Nuria Aragonés; Pilar Guallar-Castillón; Fernando Rodríguez-Artalejo; Gonzalo López-Abente; Marina Pollán Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-04-30 Impact factor: 3.295