| Literature DB >> 22253992 |
Nattinee Jitnarin1, Vongsvat Kosulwat, Nipa Rojroongwasinkul, Atitada Boonpraderm, Christopher K Haddock, Walker S C Poston.
Abstract
We evaluated the associations between overweight and obesity and socio-economic status (SES), behavioral factors, and dietary intake in Thai adults. A nationally representative sample of 6,445 Thais adults (18-70 years) was surveyed during 2004-2005. Information including demographics, SES characteristics, dietary intake, and anthropometrics were obtained. Overall, 35.0% of men, and 44.9% of women were overweight or obese (BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2) using the Asian cut-points. Regression models demonstrated that age was positively associated with being overweight in both genders. In gender-stratified analyses, male respondents who were older, lived in urban areas, had higher annual household income, and did not smoke were more likely to be classified as overweight and obese. Women who were older, had higher education, were not in a marriage-like relationship and were in semi-professional occupation were at greater risk for being overweight and obese. High carbohydrate and protein intake were found to be positively associated with BMI whereas the frequent use of dairy foods was found to be negatively associated with BMI among men. The present study found that SES factors are associated with being classified as overweight and obese in Thai adults, but associations were different between genders. Health promotion strategies regarding obesity and its related co-morbidity are necessary.Entities:
Keywords: SES; Thailand; dietary intake; overweight/obesity; smoking
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 22253992 PMCID: PMC3257614 DOI: 10.3390/nu20100060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Characteristics of a representative sample of Thai adults by gendera.
| Variables | Men (n = 3,170) | Women (n = 3,275) | p- value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 40.7 ± 17.2 | 40.8 ± 16.6 | 0.885 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.1 ± 3.4 | 23.1 ± 4.5 | <0.001 |
| Overweight, BMI ≥ 23.0 kg/m2 | 35.0 (33.3, 36.7) | 44.9 (43.2, 46.6) | <0.001 |
| Education Levels | <0.001 | ||
| Basic | 53.2 (51.5, 55.0) | 59.3 (57.6, 61.0) | |
| Secondary | 39.0 (37.3, 40.7) | 32.1 (30.5, 33.7) | |
| High | 7.8 (6.8, 8.7) | 8.6 (7.6, 9.6) | |
| Places of Residence | 0.921 | ||
| Rural | 43.8 (42.1, 45.6) | 43.9 (42.2, 45.6) | |
| Urban | 56.2 (54.5, 57.9) | 56.1 (54.4, 57.8) | |
| Annual Household income ($) | 3332.4 ± 3134.0 | 3212.3 ± 3130.2 | 0.130 |
| Currently Smoking (%) | 43.0 (41.3, 44.7) | 3.8 (3.1, 4.4) | <0.001 |
| Any Alcohol Consumption (%) | 11.5 (10.4, 12.6) | 1.0 (0.7, 1.4) | <0.001 |
| Dietary Daily Intake | |||
| Total Energy (kcal) | 1597.4 ± 636.0 | 1320.0 ± 556.6 | <0.001 |
| Carbohydrate (g) | 241.2 ± 110.7 | 199.1 ± 93.6 | <0.001 |
| Protein (g) | 60.97 ± 28.5 | 51.4 ± 26.4 | <0.001 |
| Fat (g) | 40.4 ± 27.1 | 35.1 ± 24.4 | <0.001 |
| Food Groups (serving sizes) | |||
| Rice and Starchy Foods | 9.5 ± 5.7 | 8.0 ± 4.7 | <0.001 |
| Vegetables | 6.2 ± 5.2 | 6.1 ± 5.0 | 0.549 |
| Fruits | 5.0 ± 4.8 | 5.0 ± 4.3 | 0.512 |
| Dairy | 0.3 ± 0.5 | 0.4 ± 0.7 | <0.001 |
| Meat | 13.2 ± 11.6 | 11.4 ± 9.7 | <0.001 |
aValues are means ± SD or proportions (95% confidence interval), as appropriate for the variables. P-values for the difference in variables based on chi-square test or an independent sample t-test as appropriate.
Characteristics of a representative sample of Thai adults by gender and BMI status.
| Variables | Men (n = 3,170) | Women (n = 3,275) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI < 23.0 (n = 2,056) | BMI ≥ 23.0 (n = 1,117) | BMI < 23.0 (n = 1,794) | BMI ≥ 23.0 (n = 1,463) | |
| Age (years) | 38.8 ± 17.5 | 44.2 ± 15.8*** | 37.0 ± 17.0 | 45.4 ± 14.9*** |
| Places of Residence | χ2 = 22.9*** | χ2 = 0.002 | ||
| Rural | 964 (46.9) | 421 (38.0) | 791 (44.1) | 644 (44.0) |
| Urban | 1092 (53.1) | 686 (62.0) | 1003 (55.9) | 819 (56.0) |
| Education Levels | χ2 = 9.8** | χ2 = 0.02*** | ||
| Basic | 1048 (51.2) | 630 (57.0) | 849 (47.5) | 1076 (73.6) |
| Secondary | 832 (40.6) | 399 (36.0) | 731 (40.9) | 313 (21.4) |
| High | 168 (8.2) | 77 (7.0) | 208 (11.6) | 73 (5.0) |
| Employment Status | χ2 = 3.1 | χ2 = 5.1 | ||
| Employed | 1435 (82.2) | 875 (82.9) | 996 (67.0) | 885 (63.0) |
| Retired | 99 (5.7) | 71 (6.7) | 77 (5.2) | 85 (6.1) |
| Unemployed | 212 (12.1) | 109 (10.3) | 413 (27.8) | 434 (30.9) |
| Annual Household income ($) | 3095.1 ± 2924.2 | 3775.0 ± 3451.8*** | 3145.3 ± 3032.1 | 3299.4 ± 3255.9 |
| % Tobacco Smoking | 928 (45.1) | 431 (38.9)*** | 69 (3.8) | 53 (3.6) |
| Dietary Daily Intake | ||||
| Total Energy (kcal) | 1570.4 ± 619.4 | 1644.0 ± 660.8*** | 1314.8 ± 558.2 | 1326.3 ± 555.8 |
| Carbohydrate (g) | 237.8 ± 107.6 | 247.1 ± 115.4* | 196.9 ± 92.6 | 201.9 ± 94.9 |
| Protein (g) | 59.6 ± 27.5 | 63.5 ± 30.2*** | 51.1 ± 25.9 | 51.6 ± 26.9 |
| Fat (g) | 39.5 ± 26.5 | 41.9 ± 28.3* | 35.5 ± 24.2 | 34.5 ± 24.8 |
| Food Groups (serving sizes) | ||||
| Rice and Starchy Foods | 9.5 ± 5.7 | 9.7 ± 5.6 | 7.8 ± 4.6 | 8.3 ± 4.8** |
| Vegetables | 6.1 ± 5.1 | 6.3 ± 5.3 | 5.8 ± 4.6 | 6.5 ± 5.3*** |
| Fruits | 5.0 ± 4.9 | 4.8 ± 4.5 | 5.2 ± 4.5 | 4.9 ± 4.2 |
| Dairy | 0.3 ± 0.6 | 0.2 ± 0.4*** | 0.5 ± 0.7 | 0.4 ± 0.6*** |
| Meat | 13.2 ± 11.5 | 13.2 ± 11.9 | 11.5 ± 10.0 | 11.3 ± 9.3 |
*** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05
Logistic Regression Models on the Likelihood of Being Overweight (Odd Ratios (OR) and their 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) in Men.
| Characteristics | Men (n = 3,170) | |
|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | |
| Age | ||
| 18-25 | 1.0 | |
| 26-35 | 1.8 | 1.3, 2.5*** |
| 36-45 | 2.3 | 1.6, 3.2*** |
| 46-55 | 2.6 | 1.8, 3.7*** |
| 56-65 | 2.4 | 1.6, 3.5*** |
| 66+ | 1.9 | 1.2, 2.9** |
| Place of Residents | ||
| Rural | 1.0 | |
| Urban | 1.3 | 1.1, 1.6** |
| Occupational Status | ||
| Manual | 1.0 | |
| Routine Non-manual | 1.6 | 1.3, 2.0*** |
| Semi-professional | 0.9 | 0.5, 1.6 |
| Managers & Professionals | 1.2 | 0.7, 1.9 |
| Annual Household Income | ||
| Quartile 1 | 1.0 | |
| Quartile 2 | 1.4 | 1.1, 1.7* |
| Quartile 3 | 1.8 | 1.3, 2.4*** |
| Tobacco Smoking | ||
| No | 1.0 | |
| Yes | 0.7 | 0.6, 0.8*** |
| Carbohydrate Intake | ||
| Less than 300 g (100%) | 1.0 | |
| 300-450 g (150%) | 1.5 | 1.1, 1.9** |
| 450-600 g (200%) | 0.9 | 0.6, 1.4 |
| More than 600 g (> 200%) | 1.6 | 0.8, 3.2 |
| Protein Intake | ||
| Less than 50 g (100%) | 1.0 | |
| 50-75 g (150%) | 1.1 | 0.9, 1.6 |
| 75-100 g (200%) | 1.4 | 1.0, 2.1* |
| More than 100 g (> 200%) | 1.6 | 1.1, 2.7* |
| Dairy Consumption | ||
| 1-2 portions (as recommendation) | 1.0 | |
| 3-5 portions (twice of the recommendation) | 0.6 | 0.4, 1.0* |
| More than 5 portions (more than twice) | 0.7 | 0.3, 1.8 |
*** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05
Logistic Regression Models on the Likelihood of Being Overweight (Odd Ratios (OR) and their 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) in Women.
| Characteristics | Women (n = 3,275) | |
|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | |
| Age | ||
| 18-25 | 1.0 | |
| 26-35 | 1.8 | 1.2, 2.7** |
| 36-45 | 2.5 | 1.6, 3.9*** |
| 46-55 | 4.8 | 3.0, 7.6*** |
| 56-65 | 2.9 | 1.8, 4.8*** |
| 66+ | 2.1 | 1.2, 3.8** |
| Education Levels | ||
| Basic | 1.0 | |
| Secondary | 0.6 | 0.5, 0.9** |
| High | 0.5 | 0.3, 0.9* |
| Marital Status | ||
| Married | 1.0 | |
| Others | 1.6 | 1.2, 2.1*** |
| Occupational Status | ||
| Manual | 1.0 | |
| Routine Non-manual | 1.2 | 1.0, 1.5 |
| Semi-professional | 3.3 | 1.0, 11.4* |
| Managers & Professionals | 0.5 | 0.2, 1.1 |
*** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05