Richard Hazen1, E Randall Lanier. 1. Department of Virology, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triange Park, North Carolina 27709, USA. rjh36583@gsk.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the relative in vitro potency of the antiviral agents emtricitabine (FTC), lamivudine (3TC), and zidovudine (ZDV) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), monocyte-derived macrophages, and MT-4 cells infected with HIV-1. DESIGN In vitro evaluation of the test compounds against M-tropic or T-tropic laboratory strains of HIV-1 and against clinical HIV-1 isolates from antiretroviral therapy-naive subjects using PBMCs, monocyte-derived macrophages, and MT-4 cells. METHODS: Standard methods for assessing antiviral potency based on 50% inhibitory concentrations using propidium iodide staining of host cell DNA to assess cytopathic effects or measurement of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase activity to assess inhibition of viral replication. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in potency between 3TC and FTC in assays with HIV-1(IIIB)-infected PBMCs or HIV-1(Ba-L) -infected monocyte-derived macrophages, which are primary cell types for HIV-1 infection in vivo. In agreement with earlier reports, FTC was approximately fourfold more active than 3TC in assays in the transformed T-cell line MT-4 infected with HIV-(1IIIB), whereas ZDV was more active than FTC. 3TC, FTC, and ZDV were equally active against a panel of eight primary HIV-1 isolates from antiretroviral-naive subjects in PBMCs. These results demonstrate the in vitro similarity of 3TC and FTC activity in primary cells. The variability in potency depending on cell types and viral strains underscores our observation that antiviral effects in vitro are not reliable predictors of in vivo clinical activity.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the relative in vitro potency of the antiviral agents emtricitabine (FTC), lamivudine (3TC), and zidovudine (ZDV) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), monocyte-derived macrophages, and MT-4 cells infected with HIV-1. DESIGN In vitro evaluation of the test compounds against M-tropic or T-tropic laboratory strains of HIV-1 and against clinical HIV-1 isolates from antiretroviral therapy-naive subjects using PBMCs, monocyte-derived macrophages, and MT-4 cells. METHODS: Standard methods for assessing antiviral potency based on 50% inhibitory concentrations using propidium iodide staining of host cell DNA to assess cytopathic effects or measurement of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase activity to assess inhibition of viral replication. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in potency between 3TC and FTC in assays with HIV-1(IIIB)-infected PBMCs or HIV-1(Ba-L) -infected monocyte-derived macrophages, which are primary cell types for HIV-1 infection in vivo. In agreement with earlier reports, FTC was approximately fourfold more active than 3TC in assays in the transformed T-cell line MT-4 infected with HIV-(1IIIB), whereas ZDV was more active than FTC. 3TC, FTC, and ZDV were equally active against a panel of eight primary HIV-1 isolates from antiretroviral-naive subjects in PBMCs. These results demonstrate the in vitro similarity of 3TC and FTC activity in primary cells. The variability in potency depending on cell types and viral strains underscores our observation that antiviral effects in vitro are not reliable predictors of in vivo clinical activity.
Authors: Xinhui Chen; Jose R Castillo-Mancilla; Sharon M Seifert; Kevin B McAllister; Jia-Hua Zheng; Lane R Bushman; Samantha MaWhinney; Peter L Anderson Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-08-22 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Abraham J Kandathil; Sho Sugawara; Ashish Goyal; Christine M Durand; Jeffrey Quinn; Jaiprasath Sachithanandham; Andrew M Cameron; Justin R Bailey; Alan S Perelson; Ashwin Balagopal Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Peter L Anderson; Jennifer J Kiser; Edward M Gardner; Joseph E Rower; Amie Meditz; Robert M Grant Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2010-11-30 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Andrew E Armitage; Koen Deforche; John J Welch; Kristel Van Laethem; Ricardo Camacho; Andrew Rambaut; Astrid K N Iversen Journal: J Virol Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Thomas Cherrier; Mikael Elias; Alicia Jeudy; Guillaume Gotthard; Valentin Le Douce; Houda Hallay; Patrick Masson; Andrea Janossy; Ermanno Candolfi; Olivier Rohr; Eric Chabrière; Christian Schwartz Journal: Virol J Date: 2011-07-15 Impact factor: 4.099
Authors: Andrew E Armitage; Koen Deforche; Chih-Hao Chang; Edmund Wee; Beatrice Kramer; John J Welch; Jan Gerstoft; Lars Fugger; Andrew McMichael; Andrew Rambaut; Astrid K N Iversen Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2012-03-22 Impact factor: 5.917