Literature DB >> 12623435

Biomechanical modeling of posterior instrumentation of the scoliotic spine.

C-E Aubin1, Y Petit, I A F Stokes, F Poulin, M Gardner-Morse, H Labelle.   

Abstract

Scoliosis is a three-dimensional deformation of the spine that can be treated by vertebral fusion using surgical instrumentation. However, the optimal configuration of instrumentation remains controversial. Simulating the surgical maneuvers with personalized biomechanical models may provide an analytical tool to determine instrumentation configuration during the pre-operative planning. Finite element models used in surgical simulations display convergence difficulties as a result of discontinuities and stiffness differences between elements. A kinetic model using flexible mechanisms has been developed to address this problem, and this study presents its use in the simulation of Cotrel-Dubousset Horizon surgical maneuvers. The model of the spine is composed of rigid bodies corresponding to the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae, and flexible elements representing the intervertebral structures. The model was personalized to the geometry of three scoliotic patients (with a thoracic Cobb angle of 45 degrees, 49 degrees and 39 degrees ). Binary joints and kinematic constraints were used to represent the rod-implant-vertebra joints. The correction procedure was simulated using three steps: (1) Translation of hooks and screws on the first rod; (2) 90 degrees rod rotation; (3) Hooks and screws look-up on the rod. After the simulation, slight differences of 0-6 degrees were found for the thoracic spine scoliosis and the kyphosis, and of 1-8 degrees for the axial rotation of the apical vertebra and for the orientation of the plane of maximum deformity, compared to the real post-operative shape of the patient. Reaction loads at the vertebra-implant link were mostly below 1000 N, while reaction loads at the boundary conditions (representing the overall action of the surgeon) were in the range 7-470 N and maximum torque applied to the rod was 1.8 Nm. This kinetic modeling approach using flexible mechanisms provided a realistic representation of the surgical maneuvers. It may offer a tool to predict spinal geometry correction and assist in the pre-operative planning of surgical instrumentation of the scoliotic spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12623435     DOI: 10.1080/1025584031000072237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin        ISSN: 1025-5842            Impact factor:   1.763


  21 in total

Review 1.  Computer algorithms and applications used to assist the evaluation and treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review of published articles 2000-2009.

Authors:  Philippe Phan; Neila Mezghani; Carl-Éric Aubin; Jacques A de Guise; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Intra and interobserver variability of preoperative planning for surgical instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  M Robitaille; C E Aubin; H Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Variability of spinal instrumentation configurations in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Carl-Eric Aubin; Hubert Labelle; Oana C Ciolofan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Computer simulation for the optimization of instrumentation strategies in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Younes Majdouline; Carl-Eric Aubin; Archana Sangole; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Towards determining soft tissue properties for modelling spine surgery: current progress and challenges.

Authors:  J Paige Little; Clayton Adam
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-12-25       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Comparison of Apical Axial Derotation between Adolescent Idiopathic and Neuromuscular Scoliosis with Pedicle Screw Instrumentation.

Authors:  Hitesh N Modi; Seung-Woo Suh; S Srinivasalu; Satyen Mehta; Jae-Hyuk Yang
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2008-12-31

7.  Flexible non-fusion scoliosis correction systems reduce intervertebral rotation less than rigid implants and allow growth of the spine: a finite element analysis of different features of orthobiom.

Authors:  A Rohlmann; T Zander; N K Burra; G Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  A new method to approximate load-displacement relationships of spinal motion segments for patient-specific multi-body models of scoliotic spine.

Authors:  Athena Jalalian; Francis E H Tay; Soheil Arastehfar; Gabriel Liu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Patient-specific mechanical properties of a flexible multi-body model of the scoliotic spine.

Authors:  Y Petit; C E Aubin; H Labelle
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Computer simulation for the optimization of patient positioning in spinal deformity instrumentation surgery.

Authors:  Kajsa Duke; Carl-Eric Aubin; Jean Dansereau; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 2.602

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.