Literature DB >> 12621285

The accuracy of stereolithography in planning craniofacial bone replacement.

Peter Shih-Hsin Chang1, Thornwell H Parker, Charles W Patrick, Michael J Miller.   

Abstract

Stereolithography can be used to produce physical models of the craniofacial skeleton from three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) data. The purpose of this study was to assess its accuracy for modeling osseous defects of the midface. Maxillary resections simulating unilateral maxillectomy (N = 3), bilateral maxillectomy (N = 3), and unilateral orbitomaxillectomy (N = 3) were performed as for sinus tumor resection on nine fresh cadaver skulls. Stereolithographic models (SLMs) were made from the specimen's CT data. The accuracy of SLMs was determined by comparing distances between key landmarks on the skulls and SLMs. Each SLM was grossly accurate with some loss of thin delicate structures. The mean differences in overall dimensions between the SLMs and skull specimens were 1.5 mm (range: 0-5.5 mm) for craniofacial measures, 1.2 mm (range: 0-4.8 mm) for skull base measures, 1.6 (range: 0-5.8 mm) for midface measures, 1.9 mm (range: 0-7.9 mm) for maxilla measures, and 1.5 mm (range: 0-5.7 mm) for orbital measures. The mean differences in defect dimensions were 1.9 mm (range: 0.1-5.7 mm) for unilateral maxillectomy, 0.8 mm (range: 0.2-1.5 mm) for bilateral maxillectomy, and 2.5 mm (range: 0.2-7.0 mm) for orbitomaxillectomy defects. Midface SLMs may be more prone to error than those of other craniofacial regions because of the presence of thin walls and small projections. Thus, one should consider designing midface bone replacements that are larger in critical dimensions than those predicted by preoperative modeling. These findings have important implications for the planning of current surgical methods as well as future applications of tissue-engineered bone replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12621285     DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200303000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  17 in total

1.  Stereolithographic models to guide orbital and oculoplastic surgery.

Authors:  Bijan Beigi; Tristan F W McMullan; Deepak Gupta; Mona Khandwala
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Accuracy of medical models made by consumer-grade fused deposition modelling printers.

Authors:  Christian Petropolis; Daniel Kozan; Leif Sigurdson
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.947

Review 3.  Challenges in creating dissectible anatomical 3D prints for surgical teaching.

Authors:  Ratheesraj Ratinam; Michelle Quayle; John Crock; Michelle Lazarus; Quentin Fogg; Paul McMenamin
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 4.  Measuring and Establishing the Accuracy and Reproducibility of 3D Printed Medical Models.

Authors:  Elizabeth George; Peter Liacouras; Frank J Rybicki; Dimitrios Mitsouras
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 5.  Clinical application of three-dimensional printing technology in craniofacial plastic surgery.

Authors:  Jong Woo Choi; Namkug Kim
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-05-14

6.  [Rapid prototyping in planning reconstructive surgery of the head and neck. Review and evaluation of indications in clinical use].

Authors:  J S Bill; J F Reuther
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2004-03-16

7.  Three-Dimensional (3D) Stereolithographic Tooth Replicas Accuracy Evaluation: In Vitro Pilot Study for Dental Auto-Transplant Surgical Procedures.

Authors:  Filiberto Mastrangelo; Rossella Battaglia; Dario Natale; Raimondo Quaresima
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Feasibility of preoperative planning using anatomical facsimile models for mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Corrado Toro; Massimo Robiony; Fabio Costa; Nicoletta Zerman; Massimo Politi
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 2.151

9.  A novel 3D template for mandible and maxilla reconstruction: Rapid prototyping using stereolithography.

Authors:  Samir Kumta; Monica Kumta; Leena Jain; Shrirang Purohit; Rani Ummul
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2015 Sep-Dec

10.  Experimental Validation of Plastic Mandible Models Produced by a "Low-Cost" 3-Dimensional Fused Deposition Modeling Printer.

Authors:  Federico Maschio; Mirali Pandya; Raphael Olszewski
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-03-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.