Literature DB >> 12621257

Prognostic factors in prosthetic replacement for acute proximal humerus fractures.

Mehmet Demirhan1, Onder Kilicoglu, Levent Altinel, Levent Eralp, Yilmaz Akalin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of some epidemiological and radiologic factors on the outcome of prosthetic replacement in acute proximal humerus fractures.
DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. PATIENTS: Thirty-two patients [mean age 58 (range 37-83 years)] with a mean follow-up period of 35 months (range 8-80 months). Fifteen cases had Neer type IV, 2 had type III, and 15 patients had fracture-dislocations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Neer's criteria, Constant score, and elevation degree were used. Radiological parameters were union and position of the tuberosities, bone stock, and position of the prosthesis.
RESULTS: Excellent or good results according to Neer's criteria were obtained in 24 of the 32 cases (75%), and unsatisfactory results in 8 cases (25%). Mean Constant score was 68 (range 19-98) and mean elevation degree 113 (range 30-180). Thirty-one cases (97%) had no or mild pain. Cases operated within 14 days following injury had a better general outcome (p = 0.005). The humeral offset was directly correlated to the elevation degree (p = 0.011) and Constant score (p = 0.002), whereas the head height was inversely correlated to the same parameters (p = 0.001 for both). The cutoff point for the humeral offset-general outcome correlation was calculated as 23 mm using ROC curve analysis. The most common complications were problems concerning the tuberosities (50%), and they adversely affected the clinical outcome (p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative delay, problems of tuberosity fixation, and position of the tuberosities were parameters influencing the clinical outcome. Lateralization of the tuberosities results in better scores, whereas their distal transfer can be related to a poorer outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12621257     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200303000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  27 in total

1.  [Biomechanical investigation on refixation of tuberosities on shoulder prostheses. Does refixation with different suture materials offer enough stability?].

Authors:  J Fleischer; A Schleyer; R Nassutt; H Grundei; U Grittner; S J Hopp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Bony avulsions of the rotator cuff : Arthroscopic concepts].

Authors:  S Greiner; M Scheibel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  [Rotator cuff avulsion fractures. Current concepts in the surgical treatment].

Authors:  S Pauly; M Scheibel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for complex humeral fractures: a 5 to 10-year follow-up retrospective study.

Authors:  M Giovale; T Mangano; E Rodà; I Repetto; P Cerruti; E Kuqi; F Franchin
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2014-03-23

5.  Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of three and four part fractures of the proximal humerus using Comprehensive® Fracture stem.

Authors:  Nasir Shah; Hafiz J Iqbal; Steven Brookes-Fazakerley; Chris Sinopidis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Da Vinci System: clinical experience with complex proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Raffaele Russo; Valeria Visconti; Luigi Vernaglia Lombardi; Michele Ciccarelli; Fabio Cautiero
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2010-05

7.  [Complex proximal humerus fractures--management with a humeral head prosthesis? Clinical and radiological results of a prospective study].

Authors:  P Gierer; C Simon; G Gradl; A Ewert; A Vasarhelyi; M Beck; T Mittlmeier
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Primary shoulder arthroplasty versus conservative treatment for comminuted proximal humeral fractures: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Dennis den Hartog; Jeroen de Haan; Niels W Schep; Wim E Tuinebreijer
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-02-17

9.  A convertible shoulder system: is it useful in total shoulder arthroplasty revisions?

Authors:  Jean Kany; Thomas Amouyel; Olivier Flamand; Denis Katz; Philippe Valenti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Conversion of shoulder arthroplasty to reverse implants: clinical and radiological results using a modular system.

Authors:  Alessandro Castagna; Marco Delcogliano; Francesca de Caro; Giovanni Ziveri; Mario Borroni; Stefano Gumina; Franco Postacchini; Carlo Felice De Biase
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.