Literature DB >> 12620903

Local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy: tumor biology or surgical conservatism?

Grant W Carlson1, Toncred M Styblo, Robert H Lyles, John Bostwick, Douglas R Murray, Charles A Staley, William C Wood.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term follow-up of the use of skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) in the treatment of breast cancer is presented to determine the impact of local recurrence (LR) on survival.
METHODS: A total of 539 patients were treated for 565 cases of breast cancer by SSM and immediate breast reconstruction from January 1, 1989 to December 31, 1998. The American Joint Committee on Cancer pathological staging was stage 0 175 (31%), stage I 135 (23.9%), stage II 173 (30.6%), stage III 54 (9.6%), stage IV 8 (1.4%), and recurrent 20 (3.5%). The mean follow-up was 65.4 months (range, 23.7-86.3 months). Five patients were lost to follow-up.
RESULTS: Thirty-one patients developed a LR during the follow-up including five who received adjuvant radiation. The distribution of LR stratified by cancer stage was stage 0 1, stage I 5, stage II 17, stage III 6, and recurrent 2. The overall LR was 5.5%. Twenty-four patients (77.4%) developed a systemic relapse and 7 (22.6%) patients remained free of recurrent disease at a mean follow-up of 78.1 months. The cancer stage of those remaining disease free was stage 0 1 (100%), stage I 4 (80%), and stage II 2 (11.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: LR of breast cancer after SSM is not always associated with systemic relapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12620903     DOI: 10.1245/aso.2003.03.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  20 in total

1.  A single institution experience with skin sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction.

Authors:  S Doddi; T Singhal; A Kasem; A Desai
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Trends in autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Grant W Carlson
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 3.  What is the evidence behind conservative mastectomies?

Authors:  Nicola Rocco; Giuseppe Catanuto; Maurizio Bruno Nava
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 4.  Breast reconstruction: current and future options.

Authors:  Henry Paul; Tahira I Prendergast; Bryson Nicholson; Shenita White; Wayne Ai Frederick
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2011-08-17

5.  Local recurrence of breast cancer in reconstructed breasts using TRAM flap after skin-sparing mastectomy: clinical and imaging features.

Authors:  Hyunkyung Yoo; Bo Hyun Kim; Hak Hee Kim; Joo Hee Cha; Hee Jung Shin; Taik Jong Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Mastectomy technique using a self-designed self-retaining retractor system.

Authors:  Michael Co; Ava Kwong
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 7.  Recent advances in the surgical care of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Alessandra Mascaro; Massimo Farina; Raffaella Gigli; Carlo E Vitelli; Lucio Fortunato
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Oncological outcome and patient satisfaction with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Sara Reefy; Neill Patani; Anne Anderson; Gwyne Burgoyne; Hisham Osman; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 9.  The management of Paget's disease of the breast.

Authors:  Elizabeth Marcus
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2004-04

Review 10.  Prophylactic Surgery: For Whom, When and How?

Authors:  Christine Mau; Michael Untch
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.