Literature DB >> 12613567

Reduced timing variability during bimanual coupling: a role for sensory information.

Knut Drewing1, Gisa Aschersleben.   

Abstract

On a repetitive tapping task, the within-hand variability of intertap intervals is reduced when participants tap with two hands as compared to one-hand tapping. Because this bimanual advantage can be attributed to timer variance (Wing-Kristofferson model, 1973a, b), separate timers have been proposed for each hand, whose outputs are then averaged (Helmuth & Ivry, 1996). An alternative notion is that action timing is based on its sensory reafferences (Aschersleben & Prinz, 1995; Prinz, 1990). The bimanual advantage is then due to increased sensory reafference. We studied bimanual tapping with the continuation paradigm. Participants first synchronized their taps with a metronome and then continued without the pacing signal. Experiment 1 replicated the bimanual advantage. Experiment 2 examined the influence of additional sensory reafferences. Results showed a reduction of timer variance for both uni- and bimanual tapping when auditory feedback was added to each tap. Experiment 3 showed that the bimanual advantage decreased when auditory feedback was removed from taps with the left hand. Results indicate that the sensory reafferences of both hands are used and integrated into timing. This is consistent with the assumption that the bimanual advantage is at least partly due to the increase in sensory reafference. A reformulation of the Wing-Kristofferson model is proposed to explain these results, in which the timer provides action goals in terms of sensory reafferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12613567     DOI: 10.1080/02724980244000396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  12 in total

1.  Effects of feedback from active and passive body parts on spatial and temporal parameters in sensorimotor synchronization.

Authors:  Peter E Keller; Masami Ishihara; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-03-20

2.  Hitting moving targets: effects of target speed and dimensions on movement time.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Brouwer; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Age-related changes in the bimanual advantage and in brain oscillatory activity during tapping movements suggest a decline in processing sensory reafference.

Authors:  Etienne Sallard; Lucas Spierer; Catherine Ludwig; Marie-Pierre Deiber; Jérôme Barral
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Body movement enhances the extraction of temporal structures in auditory sequences.

Authors:  Yi-Huang Su; Ernst Pöppel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-06-22

5.  Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanisms in action selection.

Authors:  Florian Waszak; Edmund Wascher; Peter Keller; Iring Koch; Gisa Aschersleben; David A Rosenbaum; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The role of action effects in infants' action control.

Authors:  Petra Hauf; Birgit Elsner; Gisa Aschersleben
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-12-03

7.  Bimanual coordination and aging: neurobehavioral implications.

Authors:  Ashley S Bangert; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Christine M Walsh; Anna B Schachter; Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Timing of bimanual movements and deafferentation: implications for the role of sensory movement effects.

Authors:  Knut Drewing; Prisca Stenneken; Jonathan Cole; Wolfgang Prinz; Gisa Aschersleben
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Crossing the arms confuses the clocks: sensory feedback and the bimanual advantage.

Authors:  Breanna E Studenka; Kinga L Eliasz; David I Shore; Ramesh Balasubramaniam
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

10.  Mutual stabilization of rhythmic vocalization and whole-body movement.

Authors:  Kohei Miyata; Kazutoshi Kudo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.