Literature DB >> 12612342

Human specific loss of olfactory receptor genes.

Yoav Gilad1, Orna Man, Svante Pääbo, Doron Lancet.   

Abstract

Olfactory receptor (OR) genes constitute the basis for the sense of smell and are encoded by the largest mammalian gene superfamily of >1,000 genes. In humans, >60% of these are pseudogenes. In contrast, the mouse OR repertoire, although of roughly equal size, contains only approximately 20% pseudogenes. We asked whether the high fraction of nonfunctional OR genes is specific to humans or is a common feature of all primates. To this end, we have compared the sequences of 50 human OR coding regions, regardless of their functional annotations, to those of their putative orthologs in chimpanzees, gorillas, orangutans, and rhesus macaques. We found that humans have accumulated mutations that disrupt OR coding regions roughly 4-fold faster than any other species sampled. As a consequence, the fraction of OR pseudogenes in humans is almost twice as high as in the non-human primates, suggesting a human-specific process of OR gene disruption, likely due to a reduced chemosensory dependence relative to apes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12612342      PMCID: PMC152291          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0535697100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  25 in total

1.  DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis.

Authors:  J Rozas; R Rozas
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Olfactory receptors.

Authors:  D Lancet; N Ben-Arie
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Genomewide comparison of DNA sequences between humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  Ingo Ebersberger; Dirk Metzler; Carsten Schwarz; Svante Pääbo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  The sense of smell: genomics of vertebrate odorant receptors.

Authors:  Janet M Young; Barbara J Trask
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 5.  Genome of the apes.

Authors:  J G Hacia
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 11.639

6.  Modern African ape populations as genetic and demographic models of the last common ancestor of humans, chimpanzees, and gorillas.

Authors:  M I Jensen-Seaman; A S Deinard; K K Kidd
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.645

7.  Functional imaging of brain activity in conscious monkeys responding to sexually arousing cues.

Authors:  C F Ferris; C T Snowdon; J A King; T Q Duong; T E Ziegler; K Ugurbil; R Ludwig; N J Schultz-Darken; Z Wu; D P Olson; J M Sullivan; P L Tannenbaum; J T Vaughan
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-07-20       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  A gene recently inactivated in human defines a new olfactory receptor family in mammals.

Authors:  S Rouquier; C Friedman; C Delettre; G van den Engh; A Blancher; B Crouau-Roy; B J Trask; D Giorgi
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  The human olfactory receptor repertoire.

Authors:  S Zozulya; F Echeverri; T Nguyen
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Olfactory receptor gene cluster on human chromosome 17: possible duplication of an ancestral receptor repertoire.

Authors:  N Ben-Arie; D Lancet; C Taylor; M Khen; N Walker; D H Ledbetter; R Carrozzo; K Patel; D Sheer; H Lehrach
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.150

View more
  80 in total

1.  Prediction of the odorant binding site of olfactory receptor proteins by human-mouse comparisons.

Authors:  Orna Man; Yoav Gilad; Doron Lancet
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Evolution of olfactory receptor genes in the human genome.

Authors:  Yoshihito Niimura; Masatoshi Nei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-09-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evolution and comparative genomics of odorant- and pheromone-associated genes in rodents.

Authors:  Richard D Emes; Scott A Beatson; Chris P Ponting; Leo Goodstadt
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 4.  Recent advances in understanding the role of nutrition in human genome evolution.

Authors:  Kaixiong Ye; Zhenglong Gu
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 8.701

5.  Pseudogene: lessons from PCR bias, identification and resurrection.

Authors:  Shan-Min Chen; Ka-Yan Ma; Jin Zeng
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 2.316

6.  Human-specific nonsense mutations identified by genome sequence comparisons.

Authors:  Yoonsoo Hahn; Byungkook Lee
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Lineage-specific loss of function of bitter taste receptor genes in humans and nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Go; Yoko Satta; Osamu Takenaka; Naoyuki Takahata
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Multi-species microarrays reveal the effect of sequence divergence on gene expression profiles.

Authors:  Yoav Gilad; Scott A Rifkin; Paul Bertone; Mark Gerstein; Kevin P White
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 9.  Cats lack a sweet taste receptor.

Authors:  Xia Li; Weihua Li; Hong Wang; Douglas L Bayley; Jie Cao; Danielle R Reed; Alexander A Bachmanov; Liquan Huang; Véronique Legrand-Defretin; Gary K Beauchamp; Joseph G Brand
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.798

10.  Dynamic functional evolution of an odorant receptor for sex-steroid-derived odors in primates.

Authors:  Hanyi Zhuang; Ming-Shan Chien; Hiroaki Matsunami
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.