Literature DB >> 12611990

Drawing sequences of segments in 3D: kinetic influences on arm configuration.

Mary D Klein Breteler1, Jan M Hondzinski, Martha Flanders.   

Abstract

Complex movements are generally thought to consist of a series of simpler elements. If this is so, how does the sensorimotor system assemble the pieces? This study recorded and evaluated sequences of arm movements to various targets placed in three-dimensional (3D) space. Subjects performed sequences consisting of single, double, or triple segments with the same first target but with different second targets. The data analysis focused on the first movement segment and evaluated hand path curvature, the hand's final approach to the first target, and the whole arm postures at the beginning and end. Although some idiosyncratic differences in approach were observed, only the final arm posture depended, in a consistent way, on which particular movement was to follow as the second segment. This provided evidence for "coarticulation" of the two segments, only at the level of arm posture, and simulations revealed that this anticipatory modification improved the energetic efficiency of the second segment. Data from movements through five consecutive triple segments (i.e., 5 triangles) were assessed to determine whether kinematic constraints, such as Donders' law, apply to repetitive drawing movements. Although such constraints could prevent the accumulation of changes in arm posture, this was not observed. Instead, in most cases, the elbow was a little bit higher at the end of each triangle than at the beginning. Taken together, the results suggest that coarticulation may facilitate the joining of two segments and the efficiency of the second movement, but does not extend over the drawing of several segments.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12611990     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01062.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  10 in total

1.  A simple rule for controlling overarm throws to different targets.

Authors:  Sherry Watts; Ivan Pessotto; Jon Hore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Posture-based or trajectory-based movement planning: a comparison of direct and indirect pointing movements.

Authors:  Frouke Hermens; Stan Gielen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Planning and drawing complex shapes.

Authors:  Martha Flanders; Leigh A Mrotek; C C A M Gielen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Modeling 3D object manipulation: synchronous single-axis joint rotations?

Authors:  Mary D Klein Breteler; Ruud G J Meulenbroek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Phonetic reduction and variation in American Sign Language: A quantitative study of sign lowering.

Authors:  Martha E Tyrone; Claude E Mauk
Journal:  Lab Phonol       Date:  2012-10-01

6.  Effect on movement selection of an evolving sensory representation: a multiple controller model of skill acquisition.

Authors:  Ashvin Shah; Andrew G Barto
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Performance differences in visually and internally guided continuous manual tracking movements.

Authors:  Benjamin A Philip; Yanchun Wu; John P Donoghue; Jerome N Sanes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Predictive mechanisms in the control of contour following.

Authors:  Julian J Tramper; Martha Flanders
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Carry-over coarticulation in joint angles.

Authors:  Eva Hansen; Britta Grimme; Hendrik Reimann; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Anticipatory coarticulation in non-speeded arm movements can be motor-equivalent, carry-over coarticulation always is.

Authors:  Eva Hansen; Britta Grimme; Hendrik Reimann; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.