Literature DB >> 12611664

Long-term follow-up of the residents of the Three Mile Island accident area: 1979-1998.

Evelyn O Talbott1, Ada O Youk, Kathleen P McHugh-Pemu, Jeanne V Zborowski.   

Abstract

The Three Mile Island (TMI) nuclear power plant accident (1979) prompted the Pennsylvania Department of Health to initiate a cohort mortality study in the TMI accident area. This study is significant because of the long follow-up (1979-1998), large cohort size (32,135), and evidence from earlier reports indicating increased cancer risks. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated to assess the mortality experience of the cohort compared with a local population. Relative risk (RR) regression modeling was performed to assess cause-specific mortality associated with radiation-related exposure variables after adjustment for individual smoking and lifestyle factors. Overall cancer mortality in this cohort was similar to the local population [SMRs = 103.7 (male); 99.8 (female)]. RR modeling showed neither maximum gamma nor likely gamma exposure was a significant predictor of all malignant neoplasms; bronchus, trachea, and lung; or heart disease mortality after adjusting for known confounders. The RR estimates for maximum gamma exposure (less than or equal to 8, 8-19, 20-34, greater than or equal to 35 mrem) in relation to all lymphatic and hematopoietic tissue (LHT) are significantly elevated (RRs = 1.00, 1.16, 2.54, 2.45, respectively) for males and are suggestive of a potential dose-response relationship, although the test for trend was not significant. An upward trend of RRs and SMRs for levels of maximum gamma exposure in relation to breast cancer in females (RRs = 1.00, 1.08, 1.13, 1.31; SMRs = 104.2, 113.2, 117.9) was also noted. Although the surveillance within the TMI cohort provides no consistent evidence that radioactivity released during the nuclear accident has had a significant impact on the overall mortality experience of these residents, several elevations persist, and certain potential dose-response relationships cannot be definitively excluded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12611664      PMCID: PMC1241392          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.5662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  22 in total

1.  OCMAP-PLUS: a program for the comprehensive analysis of occupational cohort data.

Authors:  G M Marsh; A O Youk; R A Stone; S Sefcik; C Alcorn
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.162

2.  A direct correlation among indoor Rn, soil gas Rn and geology in the Reading Prong near Boyertown, Pennsylvania.

Authors:  G M Reimer; L C Gundersen
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Fundamental carcinogenic processes and their implications for low dose risk assessment.

Authors:  K S Crump; D G Hoel; C H Langley; R Peto
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  The Three Mile Island Population Registry.

Authors:  M K Goldhaber; G K Tokuhata; E Digon; G G Caldwell; G F Stein; G Lutz; D Gur
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1983 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Ionizing radiation and cancer risk: evidence from epidemiology.

Authors:  E Ron
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  A parallel analysis of cancer mortality among atomic bomb survivors and patients with ankylosing spondylitis given X-ray therapy.

Authors:  S C Darby; E Nakashima; H Kato
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Mortality from breast cancer after irradiation during fluoroscopic examinations in patients being treated for tuberculosis.

Authors:  A B Miller; G R Howe; G J Sherman; J P Lindsay; M J Yaffe; P J Dinner; H A Risch; D L Preston
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Re: "Collision of Evidence and Assumptions: TMI Déjà View"

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Collision of evidence and assumptions: TMI déjà view.

Authors:  S Wing; D Richardson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  A reevaluation of cancer incidence near the Three Mile Island nuclear plant: the collision of evidence and assumptions.

Authors:  S Wing; D Richardson; D Armstrong; D Crawford-Brown
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  21 in total

1.  The Sequoyah corporation fuels release and the Church Rock spill: unpublicized nuclear releases in American Indian communities.

Authors:  Doug Brugge; Jamie L deLemos; Cat Bui
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  A review of non-cancer effects, especially circulatory and ocular diseases.

Authors:  Mark P Little
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Dose-responses from multi-model inference for the non-cancer disease mortality of atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  H Schöllnberger; J C Kaiser; P Jacob; L Walsh
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 4.  Review and meta-analysis of epidemiological associations between low/moderate doses of ionizing radiation and circulatory disease risks, and their possible mechanisms.

Authors:  M P Little; E J Tawn; I Tzoulaki; R Wakeford; G Hildebrandt; F Paris; S Tapio; P Elliott
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Epidemiological evidence of childhood leukaemia around nuclear power plants.

Authors:  Marek K Janiak
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Integrative proteomic and microRNA analysis of primary human coronary artery endothelial cells exposed to low-dose gamma radiation.

Authors:  Zarko Barjaktarovic; Natasa Anastasov; Omid Azimzadeh; Arundhathi Sriharshan; Hakan Sarioglu; Marius Ueffing; Hanna Tammio; Arvi Hakanen; Dariusz Leszczynski; Michael J Atkinson; Soile Tapio
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 7.  Do non-targeted effects increase or decrease low dose risk in relation to the linear-non-threshold (LNT) model?

Authors:  M P Little
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Increase of regional total cancer incidence in north Sweden due to the Chernobyl accident?

Authors:  Martin Tondel; Peter Hjalmarsson; Lennart Hardell; Göran Carlsson; Olav Axelson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 9.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of circulatory disease from exposure to low-level ionizing radiation and estimates of potential population mortality risks.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Tamara V Azizova; Dimitry Bazyka; Simon D Bouffler; Elisabeth Cardis; Sergey Chekin; Vadim V Chumak; Francis A Cucinotta; Florent de Vathaire; Per Hall; John D Harrison; Guido Hildebrandt; Victor Ivanov; Valeriy V Kashcheev; Sergiy V Klymenko; Michaela Kreuzer; Olivier Laurent; Kotaro Ozasa; Thierry Schneider; Soile Tapio; Andrew M Taylor; Ioanna Tzoulaki; Wendy L Vandoolaeghe; Richard Wakeford; Lydia B Zablotska; Wei Zhang; Steven E Lipshultz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Cardiovascular changes in atherosclerotic ApoE-deficient mice exposed to Co60 (γ) radiation.

Authors:  Prem Kumarathasan; Renaud Vincent; Erica Blais; Anu Saravanamuthu; Pallavi Gupta; Heather Wyatt; Ronald Mitchel; Mohammed Hannan; Akilesh Trivedi; Stewart Whitman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.