| Literature DB >> 12610504 |
G A Garinis1, N E Spanakis, P G Menounos, E N Manolis, G Peros.
Abstract
We report the absence of beta-catenin mutations in 63 sporadic colorectal carcinomas (SCRCs) with demonstrated decreased beta-catenin and E-cadherin mRNA expression and E-cadherin protein expression in a subset of carcinomas examined, suggesting that beta-catenin mutations are an extremely rare phenomenon in SCRCs and are not responsible for the transcriptional impairment of the beta-catenin/E-cadherin adhesion complex observed in these tumours.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12610504 PMCID: PMC2377055 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600706
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Figure 1(A) Schematic representation of the primer set used to amplify genomic DNA and cDNA of the β-catenin gene. (B) SSCP analysis of the β-catenin exon 3. Arrowheads indicate single-stranded (ss) and double-stranded (ds) DNA. (C) RT–PCR analysis of the β-catenin and E-cadherin mRNA levels. P1 and P2 represent 18S rRNA and β-catenin or E-cadherin positive controls, respectively. As an example, samples 6, 7 and 13 demonstrated a decrease of mRNA expression in both E-cadherin and β-catenin followed by a parallel decrease in E-cadherin protein expression as depicted in D. (D) E-cadherin immunohistochemical detection in SCRCs in tumour (T) and adjacent normal tissue (N) sections. Samples N6, N7, N13 and N24 demonstrated a uniform expression of E-cadherin protein along intercellular borders in normal colonic mucosa. Samples T6, T7, T13 and T24 exhibited a decreased and diffused cytoplasmic staining with occasional intensified immunoreactivity at the luminal surface.
β-catenin and E-cadherin mRNA expression in association with patients' clinicopathological features and E-cadherin protein immunohistochemical detection
| Females | 2 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 3 |
| Males | 5 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 13 | 4 | 15 | 6 | 3 |
| Right | 2 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 2 |
| Left | 2 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 3 |
| Rectum | 3 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| No | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 2 |
| Yes | 2 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 1 | 20 | 6 | 3 |
| Well/mod | 2 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 1 | 12 | 1 | 2 |
| Poor | 5 | 15 | 4 | 5 | 12 | 5 | 9 | 9 | 4 |
| A | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| B1-B2 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| C1-C2 | 4 | 16 | 4 | 5 | 18 | 2 | 16 | 6 | 1 |
| 0–3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 3 | 2 |
| 3.1–6 | 4 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 2 |
| 6.1–11 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| ( | |||||||||
| I | 3 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 23 | 0 | |||
| II | 3 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | |||
| III | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |||
ND=no difference in mRNA expression between normal and tumour sample; LN=lymph node metastasis; mod=moderate; A-C2=Astler–Coller's classification.