Literature DB >> 12610241

Willingness to pay for depression treatment in primary care.

Jürgen Unützer1, Wayne J Katon, Joan Russo, Gregory Simon, Michael von Korff, Elizabeth Lin, Edward Walker, Evette Ludman, Terry Bush.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors analyzed data from 615 depressed primary care patients to determine their willingness to pay for depression treatment.
METHODS: A sample of 615 adult patients from four primary care clinics participated in a randomized controlled trial of a disease management program for depression in primary care. Participants were asked at baseline interviews and six-month follow-up interviews how much they would be willing to pay per month for a six-month treatment that would eliminate their symptoms of depression. Multiple regression analyses were used to estimate the association between demographic and clinical factors and willingness to pay for depression treatment and to examine changes.
RESULTS: The mean amount that participants were willing to pay for depression treatment at baseline was $270+/-187 per month, or about 9 percent of the participants' household income. Willingness to pay was significantly associated with household income and with the severity of depressive symptoms. Over six months, the amount that participants were willing to pay decreased along with their severity of depressive symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: The amount that participants were willing to pay was comparable to that reported for the treatment of other chronic medical disorders and higher than the actual cost of depression treatment. Measurements of willingness to pay may be a promising method for assessing the value of treatments for common mental disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12610241     DOI: 10.1176/ps.54.3.340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Serv        ISSN: 1075-2730            Impact factor:   3.084


  15 in total

Review 1.  A 'league table' of contingent valuation results for pharmaceutical interventions: a hard pill to swallow?

Authors:  Tracey H Sach; Richard D Smith; David K Whynes
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Consumers' Valuation of Primary Care-Based Treatment Options for Mental and Substance Use Disorders.

Authors:  Andrew J Epstein; Colleen L Barry; David A Fiellin; Susan H Busch
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Determinants of willingness to pay for a new therapy in a sample of menopausal-aged women.

Authors:  Andrej Rasch; Jan-Marc Hodek; Claus Runge; Wolfgang Greiner
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Integrating depression care: the time has come.

Authors:  Kurt Kroenke
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Reducing the societal burden of depression: a review of economic costs, quality of care and effects of treatment.

Authors:  Julie M Donohue; Harold Alan Pincus
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Cost-effectiveness of on-site versus off-site collaborative care for depression in rural FQHCs.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Pyne; John C Fortney; Sip Mouden; Liya Lu; Teresa J Hudson; Dinesh Mittal
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  The importance of drug adverse effects compared with seizure control for people with epilepsy: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Andrew Lloyd; Emma McIntosh; Martin Price
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Incremental benefits and cost of coordinated anxiety learning and management for anxiety treatment in primary care.

Authors:  J M Joesch; C D Sherbourne; G Sullivan; M B Stein; M G Craske; P Roy-Byrne
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 7.723

9.  Cost-effectiveness of enhancing primary care depression management on an ongoing basis.

Authors:  Kathryn Rost; Jeffrey M Pyne; L Miriam Dickinson; Anthony T LoSasso
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  Willingness-to-pay to avoid the time spent and discomfort associated with screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Daniel E Jonas; Louise B Russell; Jon Chou; Michael Pignone
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.