Literature DB >> 12608728

The effects of activator treatment on the craniofacial structures of Class II division 1 patients.

Faruk Ayhan Basciftci1, Tancan Uysal, Ahmet Büyükerkmen, Zafer Sari.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to clarify the skeletal treatment effects induced by activator treatment. Fifty actively growing patients with Class II division 1 malocclusions were treated with an activator appliance. A control group consisting of longitudinal growth data from 20 patients (untreated Class II division 1 malocclusions) was used to eliminate possible differences in growth pattern. Lateral cephalograms of each patient were taken at the start and end of treatment. Final cephalograms were taken after a mean of 16.4 (+/- 2.0) months activator treatment, compared with a mean of 14.2 (+/- 2.4) months for the control group. Each cephalogram was traced and digitized by the same individual. The mean and standard deviations for linear and angular cephalometric measurements were analysed statistically, and intra- and inter-group changes were evaluated by paired- and independent-sample t-tests. At the end of the study period, the overjet was decreased in all patients. Ramus height, corpus length, anterior and posterior face height all increased significantly (P < 0.05). In the treatment group, ANB angle decreased and the bite was opened. The activator appliance caused maxillary incisor lingual tipping and mandibular incisor labial tipping. The overjet was decreased as a result of the increased forward growth of the mandible and dentoalveolar changes. The results demonstrated that the activator appliance has a characteristic skeletal and dental effect on the developing craniofacial complex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12608728     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/25.1.87

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of Forsus FRD EZ and Andresen activator in the treatment of class II, division 1 malocclusions.

Authors:  Fundagül Bilgiç; Güvenç Başaran; Orhan Hamamci
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Effects of two different removable functional appliances on depth of the posterior airway space : A retrospective cephalometric study.

Authors:  Jan Hourfar; Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Luisa Katharina Meißner; Jörg Alexander Lisson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes one year post-treatment in Twin Block and FORSUS FRD treated patients.

Authors:  Dinesh Chander Chaudhary; Prasanna Kumar; Mohit Sharma; Karan Nehra
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-12-15

4.  Therapeutic approach to Class II, Division 1 malocclusion with maxillary functional orthopedics.

Authors:  Aristeu Corrêa de Bittencourt Neto; Armando Yukio Saga; Ariel Adriano Reyes Pacheco; Orlando Tanaka
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

5.  Skeletal and Dental Effects of Twin-Block Appliances in Patients Treated With or Without Expansion.

Authors:  Muhammed Hilmi Buyukcavus; Burak Kale
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2021-09

6.  Frequency evaluation of different extraction protocols in orthodontic treatment during 35 years.

Authors:  Guilherme Janson; Fábio Rogério Torres Maria; Roberto Bombonatti
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.750

7.  A Prospective Study Comparing Adolescent and Post-Adolescent Periods Regarding Effects of Activator Appliance in Patients with Class II Mandibular Retrognathia by Using 3dMDface Analysis and Cephalometry.

Authors:  Esra Yüksel Coşkun; Elçin Esenlik
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-06-26

8.  A Comparative Evaluation of the Dentoskeletal Treatment Effects Using Twin Block Appliance and Myobrace System on Class II Division I Malocclusion.

Authors:  Jency Samuel Johnson; Savitha Satyaprasad; Hurlihal Sharath Chandra; Krishnamoorthy Shankar Havaldar; Ambili Raj; Nandan Suresh
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2021

9.  A prospective controlled evaluation of Class II division 1 malocclusions treated with fixed lingual mandibular growth modificator.

Authors:  Osama H Alali
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.079

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.