BACKGROUND: Concerns about potential health effects of trihalomethanes (THMs) have prompted investigations on whether infants whose mothers were periconceptionally exposed to drinking water containing THMs are at greater risk of congenital malformations. METHODS: We used two large case-control maternal interview studies that were conducted among California deliveries from 1987 through 1991. One study comprised 538 infants/fetuses with neural tube defects (NTDs) and 539 nonmalformed control infants. The second study included an additional 265 infants with NTDs, 207 infants with conotruncal heart defects, 409 infants with orofacial clefts, and 481 control infants. Expert personnel from municipal water companies estimated THM levels for a particular residence and specific periconceptional time period using quarterly monitoring measurements. Estimates were also made for four individual THM levels and for the total THM level. RESULTS: NTD risk in the first study was inversely associated with total THM exposure. Although the second study did not show the same inverse relationship for NTDs, there were no positive associations of NTDs or the other malformations with total THM as estimated from continuous models. Elevated risks were observed for the lowest category of exposure (1-24 ppb), but risks were either not substantially elevated or were imprecise for higher exposure levels. Thus no evidence was observed for an exposure-response relation. CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not provide a clear pattern of association between THM exposure and risks of specific congenital malformations. Imprecise exposure measures coupled with a lack of information about other possible sources of THM exposure may have caused associations to be underestimated.
BACKGROUND: Concerns about potential health effects of trihalomethanes (THMs) have prompted investigations on whether infants whose mothers were periconceptionally exposed to drinking water containing THMs are at greater risk of congenital malformations. METHODS: We used two large case-control maternal interview studies that were conducted among California deliveries from 1987 through 1991. One study comprised 538 infants/fetuses with neural tube defects (NTDs) and 539 nonmalformed control infants. The second study included an additional 265 infants with NTDs, 207 infants with conotruncal heart defects, 409 infants with orofacial clefts, and 481 control infants. Expert personnel from municipal water companies estimated THM levels for a particular residence and specific periconceptional time period using quarterly monitoring measurements. Estimates were also made for four individual THM levels and for the total THM level. RESULTS: NTD risk in the first study was inversely associated with total THM exposure. Although the second study did not show the same inverse relationship for NTDs, there were no positive associations of NTDs or the other malformations with total THM as estimated from continuous models. Elevated risks were observed for the lowest category of exposure (1-24 ppb), but risks were either not substantially elevated or were imprecise for higher exposure levels. Thus no evidence was observed for an exposure-response relation. CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not provide a clear pattern of association between THM exposure and risks of specific congenital malformations. Imprecise exposure measures coupled with a lack of information about other possible sources of THM exposure may have caused associations to be underestimated.
Authors: John A Kaufman; J Michael Wright; Amanda Evans; Zorimar Rivera-Núñez; Amy Meyer; Michael G Narotsky Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Mireille B Toledano; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen; Nicky Best; Heather Whitaker; Peter Hambly; Cornelis de Hoogh; John Fawell; Lars Jarup; Paul Elliott Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen; David Martinez; James Grellier; James Bennett; Nicky Best; Nina Iszatt; Martine Vrijheid; Mireille B Toledano Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2009-06-15 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Peter Weyer; Anthony Rhoads; Jonathan Suhl; Thomas J Luben; Kristin M Conway; Peter H Langlois; Dereck Shen; Dong Liang; Soman Puzhankara; Marlene Anderka; Erin Bell; Marcia L Feldkamp; Adrienne T Hoyt; Bridget Mosley; Jennita Reefhuis; Paul A Romitti Journal: Birth Defects Res Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 2.344
Authors: Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen; Mireille B Toledano; James Bennett; Nicky Best; Peter Hambly; Cornelis de Hoogh; Diana Wellesley; Patricia A Boyd; Lenore Abramsky; Nirupa Dattani; John Fawell; David Briggs; Lars Jarup; Paul Elliott Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Ben G Armstrong; Helen Dolk; Sam Pattenden; Martine Vrijheid; Maria Loane; Judith Rankin; Chris E Dunn; Chris Grundy; Lenore Abramsky; Patricia A Boyd; David Stone; Diana Wellesley Journal: Emerg Themes Epidemiol Date: 2007-07-06