Literature DB >> 12606571

Separation of genetic functions controlling organ identity in flowers.

Emma Keck1, Paula McSteen, Rosemary Carpenter, Enrico Coen.   

Abstract

Comparative studies on the ABC model of floral development have revealed extensive conservation of B and C class genes, but have failed to identify similar conservation for A class genes. Using a reverse genetic approach, we show that the previous inability to obtain Antirrhinum mutants corresponding to the A class gene AP2 of Arabidopsis reflects greater genetic redundancy in Antirrhinum . Antirrhinum has two genes corresponding to AP2, termed LIP1 and LIP2, both of which need to be inactivated to give a mutant phenotype. Analysis of interactions between LIP and class B/C genes shows that unlike AP2 in Arabidopsis, LIP genes are not required for repression of C in outer whorls of the flower. However, like AP2, LIP genes play a role in sepal, petal and ovule development, although some of their detailed effects are different, reflecting the diverse morphologies of Antirrhinum and Arabidopsis flowers. The dual functions for which AP2 is required in Arabidopsis are therefore separate in Antirrhinum, showing that the genetic basis of some aspects of organ identity have undergone major evolutionary change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12606571      PMCID: PMC150331          DOI: 10.1093/emboj/cdg097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  35 in total

1.  Negative regulation of the Arabidopsis homeotic gene AGAMOUS by the APETALA2 product.

Authors:  G N Drews; J L Bowman; E M Meyerowitz
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-06-14       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Floral homeotic mutations produced by transposon-mutagenesis in Antirrhinum majus.

Authors:  R Carpenter; E S Coen
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Ternary complex formation between the MADS-box proteins SQUAMOSA, DEFICIENS and GLOBOSA is involved in the control of floral architecture in Antirrhinum majus.

Authors:  M Egea-Cortines; H Saedler; H Sommer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Isolation of the tomato AGAMOUS gene TAG1 and analysis of its homeotic role in transgenic plants.

Authors:  L Pnueli; D Hareven; S D Rounsley; M F Yanofsky; E Lifschitz
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  Homeotic Transformation of Ovules into Carpel-like Structures in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Z. Modrusan; L. Reiser; K. A. Feldmann; R. L. Fischer; G. W. Haughn
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  Manipulation of flower structure in transgenic tobacco.

Authors:  M A Mandel; J L Bowman; S A Kempin; H Ma; E M Meyerowitz; M F Yanofsky
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-10-02       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Bracteomania, an inflorescence anomaly, is caused by the loss of function of the MADS-box gene squamosa in Antirrhinum majus.

Authors:  P Huijser; J Klein; W E Lönnig; H Meijer; H Saedler; H Sommer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  CHORIPETALA and DESPENTEADO: general regulators during plant development and potential floral targets of FIMBRIATA-mediated degradation.

Authors:  M Wilkinson; E de Andrade Silva; S Zachgo; H Saedler; Z Schwarz-Sommer
Journal:  Development       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  Genetic interactions among floral homeotic genes of Arabidopsis.

Authors:  J L Bowman; D R Smyth; E M Meyerowitz
Journal:  Development       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  STYLOSA and FISTULATA: regulatory components of the homeotic control of Antirrhinum floral organogenesis.

Authors:  P Motte; H Saedler; Z Schwarz-Sommer
Journal:  Development       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of ovule development.

Authors:  Debra J Skinner; Theresa A Hill; Charles S Gasser
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  CINCINNATA controls both cell differentiation and growth in petal lobes and leaves of Antirrhinum.

Authors:  Brian C W Crawford; Utpal Nath; Rosemary Carpenter; Enrico S Coen
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 3.  Molecular and genetic mechanisms of floral control.

Authors:  Thomas Jack
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2004-03-12       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Phylogenetic and evolutionary analysis of A-, B-, C- and E-class MADS-box genes in the basal eudicot Platanus acerifolia.

Authors:  Zhineng Li; Jiaqi Zhang; Guofeng Liu; Xiaomei Li; Chen Lu; Junwei Zhang; Manzhu Bao
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 5.  Morphogenesis of flowers--our evolving view.

Authors:  David R Smyth
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  On reconciling the interactions between APETALA2, miR172 and AGAMOUS with the ABC model of flower development.

Authors:  Heike Wollmann; Erica Mica; Marco Todesco; Jeff A Long; Detlef Weigel
Journal:  Development       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 7.  The ABC model and its applicability to basal angiosperms.

Authors:  Douglas E Soltis; André S Chanderbali; Sangtae Kim; Matyas Buzgo; Pamela S Soltis
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 8.  Aquilegia as a model system for the evolution and ecology of petals.

Authors:  Elena M Kramer; Scott A Hodges
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Determination of sexual organ development.

Authors:  Chiara A Airoldi
Journal:  Sex Plant Reprod       Date:  2009-12-23

10.  FORMOSA controls cell division and expansion during floral development in Antirrhinum majus.

Authors:  Luciana Delgado-Benarroch; Barry Causier; Julia Weiss; Marcos Egea-Cortines
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 4.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.