Literature DB >> 12602664

Pharmacotherapy for allergic rhinitis: a critical review of leukotriene receptor antagonists compared with other treatments.

Robert A Nathan1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the mechanisms and clinical efficacy of leukotriene receptor antagonists, which are investigational therapies for allergic rhinitis, compared with intranasal corticosteroids and nonsedating antihistamines, which are the most commonly prescribed pharmacotherapies for allergic rhinitis. DATA SOURCES: Computer-assisted MEDLINE searches for articles and manual searches of conference proceedings on intranasal corticosteroid, antihistamine, leukotriene receptor antagonist, leukotriene modifier, zafirlukast, montelukast, allergic rhinitis, rhinitis, and asthma. SELECTION: Published articles and pertinent abstracts on the topics identified above were selected. Head-to-head comparator trials as well as data from placebo-controlled trials were selected. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: The studies published to date demonstrate that leukotriene receptor antagonists are sometimes more effective than placebo, are no more effective than nonsedating antihistamines, and are less effective than intranasal corticosteroids in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. The combination of a leukotriene receptor antagonist and an antihistamine has not been proven to be more effective than either agent alone. This review reveals several inconsistencies that require resolution. First, whereas leukotriene receptor antagonists are predicted on the basis of their mechanism of action to improve nasal congestion significantly, clinical studies reveal leukotriene receptor antagonists to be no better than antihistamines at improving congestion. Second, leukotriene receptor antagonists would not be expected on the basis of their putative mechanism of action or nasal challenge data to improve significantly sneezing, nasal itching, or drainage. However, some studies show improvement in these symptoms during treatment with leukotriene receptor antagonists. Considered in aggregate, the data available to date do not clearly support a unique role of leukotriene receptor antagonists in the treatment of allergic rhinitis whether or not it is accompanied by asthma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12602664     DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62138-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol        ISSN: 1081-1206            Impact factor:   6.347


  7 in total

Review 1.  Hay fever in adolescents and adults.

Authors:  Aziz Sheikh; Sukhmeet Singh Panesar; Sarah Salvilla; Sangeeta Dhami
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-11-18

Review 2.  Allergic rhinitis in children : diagnosis and management strategies.

Authors:  William E Berger
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.022

3.  Pathophysiology of nasal congestion.

Authors:  Robert M Naclerio; Claus Bachert; James N Baraniuk
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2010-04-08

Review 4.  Montelukast in the treatment of allergic rhinitis: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Anjuli Nayak; Ronald B Langdon
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  The efficacy and safety of selective H1-antihistamine versus leukotriene receptor antagonist for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Xu; Jixiang Zhang; Jun Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Management of persistent allergic rhinitis: evidence-based treatment with levocetirizine.

Authors:  Joaquim Mullol; Claus Bachert; Jean Bousquet
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  β-Glucan supplementation, allergy symptoms, and quality of life in self-described ragweed allergy sufferers.

Authors:  Shawn M Talbott; Julie A Talbott; Tracy L Talbott; Elaine Dingler
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.863

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.