Literature DB >> 12602621

A regional survey of malformed frogs in Minnesota (USA) (Minnesota malformed frogs).

Susan M Vandenlangenberg1, Jeffrey T Canfield, Joseph A Magner.   

Abstract

In late 1995, school children discovered malformed frogs in a south central Minnesota pond. Press coverage resulted in numerous citizen reports of frog malformation across Minnesota in 1996. After some initial site investigation, 3 affected frog sites and 4 nearby reference sites were selected for more detailed evaluation. Field biologists made 89 visits to study sites beginning spring 1997 through fall 1999 to examine the number and type of frog malformations. Over 5,100 Leopard frogs (Rana pipiens) were captured and examined at all study sites. Water elevations and associated littoral inundation were recorded from 1997-2000. Results indicate that malformation occurred at all study sites above historical background levels. Rana pipiens malformation across all sites over three seasons averaged 7.9% and ranged from 0 to 7% at reference sites and 4 to 23% at affected sites. At one northern Minnesota site, mink frog (Rana septentrionalis) malformation was 75% in 1998. A site characteristic common to the most affected sites was an elastic zone of littoral inundation. Climate driven hydrologic variation likely influenced water depth and associated breeding locations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12602621     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021684723301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  11 in total

1.  Complex causes of amphibian population declines.

Authors:  J M Kiesecker; A R Blaustein; L K Belden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-04-05       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Morphological clues from multilegged frogs: are retinoids to blame?

Authors:  S K Sessions; R A Franssen; V L Horner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-04-30       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Hind limb malformations in free-living northern leopard frogs (Rana pipiens) from Maine, Minnesota, and Vermont suggest multiple etiologies.

Authors:  C U Meteyer; I K Loeffler; J F Fallon; K A Converse; E Green; J C Helgen; S Kersten; R Levey; L Eaton-Poole; J G Burkhart
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  2000-09

4.  The effect of trematode infection on amphibian limb development and survivorship.

Authors:  P T Johnson; K B Lunde; E G Ritchie; A E Launer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-04-30       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Amphibian deformities continue to puzzle researchers.

Authors:  C W Schmidt
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Terminology of developmental abnormalities in common laboratory mammals (version 1).

Authors:  L D Wise; S L Beck; D Beltrame; B K Beyer; I Chahoud; R L Clark; R Clark; A M Druga; M H Feuston; P Guittin; S M Henwood; C A Kimmel; P Lindstrom; A K Palmer; J A Petrere; H M Solomon; M Yasuda; R G York
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1997-04

7.  Environmentally induced limb malformations in mink frogs (Rana septentrionalis).

Authors:  D M Gardiner; D M Hoppe
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1999-07-01

8.  Hindlimb deformities (ectromelia, ectrodactyly) in free-living anurans from agricultural habitats.

Authors:  M Ouellet; J Bonin; J Rodrigue; J L DesGranges; S Lair
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.535

9.  Ambient UV-B radiation causes deformities in amphibian embryos.

Authors:  A R Blaustein; J M Kiesecker; D P Chivers; R G Anthony
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Induction of mortality and malformation in Xenopus laevis embryos by water sources associated with field frog deformities.

Authors:  J G Burkhart; J C Helgen; D J Fort; K Gallagher; D Bowers; T L Propst; M Gernes; J Magner; M D Shelby; G Lucier
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.