Literature DB >> 10935979

Hind limb malformations in free-living northern leopard frogs (Rana pipiens) from Maine, Minnesota, and Vermont suggest multiple etiologies.

C U Meteyer1, I K Loeffler, J F Fallon, K A Converse, E Green, J C Helgen, S Kersten, R Levey, L Eaton-Poole, J G Burkhart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reports of malformed frogs have increased throughout the North American continent in recent years. Most of the observed malformations have involved the hind limbs. The goal of this study was to accurately characterize the hind limb malformations in wild frogs as an important step toward understanding the possible etiologies.
METHODS: During 1997 and 1998, 182 recently metamorphosed northern leopard frogs (Rana pipiens) were collected from Minnesota, Vermont, and Maine. Malformed hind limbs were present in 157 (86%) of these frogs, which underwent necropsy and radiographic evaluation at the National Wildlife Health Center. These malformations are described in detail and classified into four major categories: (1) no limb (amelia); (2) multiple limbs or limb elements (polymelia, polydactyly, polyphalangy); (3) reduced limb segments or elements (phocomelia, ectromelia, ectrodactyly, and brachydactyly; and (4) distally complete but malformed limb (bone rotations, bridging, skin webbing, and micromelia).
RESULTS: Amelia and reduced segments and/or elements were the most common finding. Frogs with bilateral hind limb malformations were not common, and in only eight of these 22 frogs were the malformations symmetrical. Malformations of a given type tended to occur in frogs collected from the same site, but the types of malformations varied widely among all three states, and between study sites within Minnesota.
CONCLUSIONS: Clustering of malformation type suggests that developmental events may produce a variety of phenotypes depending on the timing, sequence, and severity of the environmental insult. Hind limb malformations in free-living frogs transcend current mechanistic explanations of tetrapod limb development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10935979     DOI: 10.1002/1096-9926(200009)62:3<151::AID-TERA3>3.0.CO;2-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Teratology        ISSN: 0040-3709


  10 in total

1.  In situ effects of pesticides on amphibians in the Sierra Nevada.

Authors:  Donald W Sparling; John Bickham; Deborah Cowman; Gary M Fellers; Thomas Lacher; Cole W Matson; Laura McConnell
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Presence of Ribeiroia ondatrae in the developing anuran limb disrupts retinoic acid levels.

Authors:  Dorina Szuroczki; Nicholas D Vesprini; Tim R B Jones; Gaynor E Spencer; Robert L Carlone
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Low levels of sodium and potassium in the water from wetlands in Minnesota that contained malformed frogs affect the rate of Xenopus development.

Authors:  Eric A E Garber; Judith L Erb; Joseph Magner; Gerald Larsen
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  The archipelago of Fernando de Noronha: an intriguing malformed toad hotspot in South America.

Authors:  Luís Felipe Toledo; Ricardo S Ribeiro
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.184

5.  Morphological abnormalities in frogs from a rice-growing region in NSW, Australia, with investigations into pesticide exposure.

Authors:  Nicholas Spolyarich; Ross V Hyne; Scott P Wilson; Carolyn G Palmer; Maria Byrne
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Oxidation of retinoic acids in hepatic microsomes of wild bullfrogs Lithobates catesbeianus environmentally-exposed to a gradient of agricultural contamination.

Authors:  Janik Thibodeau; Sébastien Filion; Philip Spear; Joanne Paquin; Monique Boily
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  A regional survey of malformed frogs in Minnesota (USA) (Minnesota malformed frogs).

Authors:  Susan M Vandenlangenberg; Jeffrey T Canfield; Joseph A Magner
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Proximity to pollution sources and risk of amphibian limb malformation.

Authors:  Brynn Taylor; David Skelly; Livia K Demarchis; Martin D Slade; Deron Galusha; Peter M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Localized hotspots drive continental geography of abnormal amphibians on U.S. wildlife refuges.

Authors:  Mari K Reeves; Kimberly A Medley; Alfred E Pinkney; Marcel Holyoak; Pieter T J Johnson; Michael J Lannoo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Indicators of the statuses of amphibian populations and their potential for exposure to atrazine in four midwestern U.S. conservation areas.

Authors:  Walt Sadinski; Mark Roth; Tyrone Hayes; Perry Jones; Alisa Gallant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.