Literature DB >> 12601797

Potential energy functions: from consistent force fields to spectroscopically determined polarizable force fields.

Kim Palmo1, Berit Mannfors, Noemi G Mirkin, Samuel Krimm.   

Abstract

We review our methodology for producing physically accurate potential energy functions, particularly relevant in the context of Lifson's goal of including frequency agreement as one of the criteria of a self-consistent force field. Our spectroscopically determined force field (SDFF) procedure guarantees such agreement by imposing it as an initial constraint on parameter optimization, and accomplishes this by an analytical transformation of ab initio "data" into the energy function format. After describing the elements of the SDFF protocol, we indicate its implementation to date and then discuss recent advances in our representation of the force field, in particular those required to produce an SDFF for the peptide group. Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers: 383-394, 2003

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12601797     DOI: 10.1002/bip.10254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biopolymers        ISSN: 0006-3525            Impact factor:   2.505


  12 in total

1.  Protein dynamics from NMR: the slowly relaxing local structure analysis compared with model-free analysis.

Authors:  Eva Meirovitch; Yury E Shapiro; Antonino Polimeno; Jack H Freed
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 2.781

2.  Quantifying Lipari-Szabo modelfree parameters from 13CO NMR relaxation experiments.

Authors:  Tianzhi Wang; Daniel S Weaver; Sheng Cai; Erik R P Zuiderweg
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Gaussian induced dipole polarization model.

Authors:  Dennis Elking; Tom Darden; Robert J Woods
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Continuum polarizable force field within the Poisson-Boltzmann framework.

Authors:  Yu-Hong Tan; Chunhu Tan; Junmei Wang; Ray Luo
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 5.  Force field development phase II: Relaxation of physics-based criteria… or inclusion of more rigorous physics into the representation of molecular energetics.

Authors:  A T Hagler
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 6.  Biomolecular force fields: where have we been, where are we now, where do we need to go and how do we get there?

Authors:  Pnina Dauber-Osguthorpe; A T Hagler
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 7.  The MOD-QM/MM Method: Applications to Studies of Photosystem II and DNA G-Quadruplexes.

Authors:  M Askerka; J Ho; E R Batista; J A Gascón; V S Batista
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 1.600

8.  Polarization effects in molecular mechanical force fields.

Authors:  Piotr Cieplak; François-Yves Dupradeau; Yong Duan; Junmei Wang
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 2.333

9.  Tinker 8: Software Tools for Molecular Design.

Authors:  Joshua A Rackers; Zhi Wang; Chao Lu; Marie L Laury; Louis Lagardère; Michael J Schnieders; Jean-Philip Piquemal; Pengyu Ren; Jay W Ponder
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 10.  Acyl chain order parameter profiles in phospholipid bilayers: computation from molecular dynamics simulations and comparison with 2H NMR experiments.

Authors:  Louic S Vermeer; Bert L de Groot; Valérie Réat; Alain Milon; Jerzy Czaplicki
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 1.733

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.