Literature DB >> 12598687

Gene genealogies when the sample size exceeds the effective size of the population.

John Wakeley1, Tsuyoshi Takahashi.   

Abstract

We study the properties of gene genealogies for large samples using a continuous approximation introduced by R. A. Fisher. We show that the major effect of large sample size, relative to the effective size of the population, is to increase the proportion of polymorphisms at which the mutant type is found in a single copy in the sample. We derive analytical expressions for the expected number of these singleton polymorphisms and for the total number of polymorphic, or segregating, sites that are valid even when the sample size is much greater than the effective size of the population. We use simulations to assess the accuracy of these predictions and to investigate other aspects of large-sample genealogies. Lastly, we apply our results to some data from Pacific oysters sampled from British Columbia. This illustrates that, when large samples are available, it is possible to estimate the mutation rate and the effective population size separately, in contrast to the case of small samples in which only the product of the mutation rate and the effective population size can be estimated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12598687     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  21 in total

Review 1.  The limits of theoretical population genetics.

Authors:  John Wakeley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Estimating the total genetic diversity of a spatial field population from a sample and implications of its dependence on habitat area.

Authors:  Erik M Rauch; Yaneer Bar-Yam
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Coalescent processes when the distribution of offspring number among individuals is highly skewed.

Authors:  Bjarki Eldon; John Wakeley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Hitchhiking both ways: effect of two interfering selective sweeps on linked neutral variation.

Authors:  Luis-Miguel Chevin; Sylvain Billiard; Frédéric Hospital
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Extensions of the coalescent effective population size.

Authors:  John Wakeley; Ori Sargsyan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Inferring Very Recent Population Growth Rate from Population-Scale Sequencing Data: Using a Large-Sample Coalescent Estimator.

Authors:  Hua Chen; Jody Hey; Kun Chen
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Inferring Demography and Selection in Organisms Characterized by Skewed Offspring Distributions.

Authors:  Andrew M Sackman; Rebecca B Harris; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Distortion of genealogical properties when the sample is very large.

Authors:  Anand Bhaskar; Andrew G Clark; Yun S Song
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Genetic diversity and population structure of Sepia officinalis from the Tunisian cost revealed by mitochondrial COI sequences.

Authors:  Tir Meriam; Tombari Wafa; Telahigue Khawla; Hajji Tarek; Ghram Abdeljelil; Elcafsi Mhamed
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.316

10.  Deep resequencing reveals excess rare recent variants consistent with explosive population growth.

Authors:  Alex Coventry; Lara M Bull-Otterson; Xiaoming Liu; Andrew G Clark; Taylor J Maxwell; Jacy Crosby; James E Hixson; Thomas J Rea; Donna M Muzny; Lora R Lewis; David A Wheeler; Aniko Sabo; Christine Lusk; Kenneth G Weiss; Humeira Akbar; Andrew Cree; Alicia C Hawes; Irene Newsham; Robin T Varghese; Donna Villasana; Shannon Gross; Vandita Joshi; Jireh Santibanez; Margaret Morgan; Kyle Chang; Walker Hale Iv; Alan R Templeton; Eric Boerwinkle; Richard Gibbs; Charles F Sing
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.