Literature DB >> 12597208

Development of form and function in peripheral auditory structures of the zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Dennis M Higgs1, Audrey K Rollo, Marcy J Souza, Arthur N Popper.   

Abstract

Investigations of the development of auditory form and function have, with a few exceptions, thus far been largely restricted to birds and mammals, making it difficult to postulate evolutionary hypotheses. Teleost fishes represent useful models for developmental investigations of the auditory system due to their often extensive period of posthatching development and the diversity of auditory specializations in this group. Using the auditory brainstem response and morphological techniques we investigated the development of auditory form and function in zebrafish (Danio rerio) ranging in size from 10 to 45 mm total length. We found no difference in auditory sensitivity, response latency, or response amplitude with development, but we did find an expansion of maximum detectable frequency from 200 Hz at 10 mm to 4000 Hz at 45 mm TL. The expansion of frequency range coincided with the development of Weberian ossicles in zebrafish, suggesting that changes in hearing ability in this species are driven more by development of auxiliary specializations than by the ear itself. We propose a model for the development of zebrafish hearing wherein the Weberian ossicles gradually increase the range of frequencies available to the inner ear, much as middle ear development increases frequency range in mammals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12597208     DOI: 10.1121/1.1536185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  31 in total

1.  Myosin VI and VIIa distribution among inner ear epithelia in diverse fishes.

Authors:  Allison B Coffin; Alain Dabdoub; Matthew W Kelley; Arthur N Popper
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Closed-loop control of zebrafish response using a bioinspired robotic-fish in a preference test.

Authors:  Vladislav Kopman; Jeffrey Laut; Giovanni Polverino; Maurizio Porfiri
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  A proposed mechanism for the observed ontogenetic improvement in the hearing ability of hapuka (Polyprion oxygeneios).

Authors:  P E Caiger; J C Montgomery; M Bruce; J Lu; C A Radford
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Seasonal plasticity of auditory hair cell frequency sensitivity correlates with plasma steroid levels in vocal fish.

Authors:  Kevin N Rohmann; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 5.  Behavioral methods for the functional assessment of hair cells in zebrafish.

Authors:  Qin Yang; Peng Sun; Shi Chen; Hongzhe Li; Fangyi Chen
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 4.592

6.  Hearing sensitivity differs between zebrafish lines used in auditory research.

Authors:  J David Monroe; Dustin P Manning; Phillip M Uribe; Ashwin Bhandiwad; Joseph A Sisneros; Michael E Smith; Allison B Coffin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Saccular potentials of the vocal plainfin midshipman fish, Porichthys notatus.

Authors:  Joseph A Sisneros
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-12-02       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Ontogenetic development of auditory sensitivity and sound production in the squeaker catfish Synodontis schoutedeni.

Authors:  Walter Lechner; Lidia Eva Wysocki; Friedrich Ladich
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 7.431

9.  Objective threshold estimation and measurement of the residual background noise in auditory evoked potentials of goldfish.

Authors:  Jianqiang Xiao; Christopher B Braun
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory sensitivity of larval zebrafish (Danio rerio) measured using a behavioral prepulse inhibition assay.

Authors:  Ashwin A Bhandiwad; David G Zeddies; David W Raible; Edwin W Rubel; Joseph A Sisneros
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.