Literature DB >> 1259543

EMG feedback therapy: review of treatment of 114 patients.

J Brudny, J Korein, B B Grynbaum, L W Friedmann, S Weinstein, G Sachs-Frankel, P V Belandres.   

Abstract

Advances in the understanding of the relationship of proprioceptive (kinesthetic) feedback to motor physiology have prompted the study of therapeutic effects of audiovisual displays of EMG activity. Patients with various manifestations of disturbed neuromotor control were studied prospectively for three years. This group included 114 patients with hemiparesis, torticollis, dystonia, and spinal cord or peripheral nerve injury. Initially, all but one of these patients had some residual volitional motor activity, which was insufficient for adequate function, and all patients had had conventional therapy with little or no functional recovery. Prior to EMG feedback therapy, the duration of illness was from three months to 35 years. The shaping of a patient's motor responses usually occurred gradually, often over an 8 to 12 week period. This modification was accomplished by feeding processed audio-visual signals back to the patient. These signals were proportional to the degree of activity of the muscles responsible for the defective function. The concept of microvolt-second, as a unit of muscle activity, is introduced and defined. Patterned movements, which were previously defective were observed to improve to varying degrees. Following the initial course of treatment, reinforcement was required by some patients. The mechanisms of improvement after EMG feeback therapy are not well understood; however, some hypotheses are presented. The results of this study indicate that EMG feedback therapy may induce significant functional recovery in patients with disturbed neuromotor control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1259543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  12 in total

Review 1.  EMG feedback for the treatment of upper-extremity dysfunction: can it be effective?

Authors:  J Tries
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1989-03

Review 2.  Research foundations of EMG biofeedback in rehabilitation.

Authors:  J V Basmajian
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1988-12

3.  Use of ramp threshold feedback for learning of fine muscular control.

Authors:  D Armstrong; M Moon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Electromyographic biofeedback: behavioral treatment of neuromuscular disorders.

Authors:  F J Keefe; R S Surwit
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1978-03

Review 5.  Biofeedback training in disordered defecation. A critical review.

Authors:  P Enck
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Biofeedback in physical medicine and rehabilitation.

Authors:  C K Fernando; J V Basmajian
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1978-12

7.  In vivo EMG biofeedback in violin and viola pedagogy.

Authors:  W R LeVine; J K Irvine
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1984-06

8.  Operant treatment of orofacial dysfunction in neuromuscular disorders.

Authors:  L H Parker; M F Cataldo; G Bourland; C S Emurian; R J Corbin; J M Page
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1984

9.  Delayed sensory feedback in the learning of a novel motor task.

Authors:  T Mulder; W Hulstijn
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1985

10.  EMG biofeedback treatment of torticollis: a controlled outcome study.

Authors:  M Jahanshahi; G Sartory; C D Marsden
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1991-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.