Literature DB >> 10684709

Potential therapeutic role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in node-positive endometrial cancer.

A Mariani1, M J Webb, L Galli, K C Podratz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the potential therapeutic role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PAL) in high-risk patients with endometrial cancer.
METHODS: We studied two groups of patients with endometrial cancer who underwent operation at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) during the interval 1984 to 1993: (1) 137 patients at high risk for para-aortic lymph node involvement (myometrial invasion >50%, palpable positive pelvic nodes, or positive adnexae), excluding stage IV disease, and (2) 51 patients with positive nodes (pelvic or para-aortic), excluding stage IV disease. By our definition, PAL required removal of five or more para-aortic nodes.
RESULTS: In both groups, no significant difference existed between patients who had PAL (PAL+) and those who did not (PAL-) in regard to clinical or pathologic variables, percentage irradiated, or surgical or radiation complications. Among the 137 high-risk patients, the 5-year progression-free survival was 62% and the 5-year overall survival was 71% for the PAL- group compared with 77 and 85%, respectively, for the PAL+ group (P = 0.12 and 0.06, respectively). For the 51 patients with positive nodes, the 5-year progression-free survival and 5-year overall survival for the PAL- group were 36 and 42% compared with 76 and 77% for the PAL+ group (P = 0.02 and 0.05, respectively). Lymph node recurrences were detected in 37% of the PAL- patients but in none of the PAL+ patients (P = 0.01). Multivariate analysis suggested that submission to PAL was a cogent predictor of progression-free survival (odds ratio = 0.25; P = 0.01) and overall survival (odds ratio = 0.23; P = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a potential therapeutic role for formal PAL in endometrial cancer. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10684709     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1999.5688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  40 in total

Review 1.  Lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: is paraaortic lymphadenectomy necessary?

Authors:  Nobuo Yaegashi; Kiyoshi Ito; Hitoshi Niikura
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Lymphadenectomy should be performed up to the renal vein in patients with intermediate-high risk endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Ismail Alay; Taner Turan; Isin Ureyen; Alper Karalok; Tolga Tasci; Ahmet Ozfuttu; M Faruk Kose; Gokhan Tulunay
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  Recent advances in research on epigenetic alterations and clinical significance of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer: an introduction.

Authors:  Noriaki Sakuragi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Ploidy and S-phase fraction are correlated with lymphovascular space invasion that is predictive of outcomes in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Taejong Song; Jeong-Won Lee; Chel Hun Choi; Tae-Joong Kim; Duk-Soo Bae; Chang Ohk Sung; Sang Yong Song; Byoung-Gie Kim
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Therapeutic role of systematic lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Mei-Yi Li; Xiao-Xia Hu; Jian-Hong Zhong; Lu-Lu Chen; Yong-Xiu Lin
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Is there a benefit of lymphadenectomy for overall and recurrence-free survival in type I FIGO IB G1-2 endometrial carcinoma? A retrospective population-based cohort analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Papathemelis; Dunja Hassas; Michael Gerken; Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke; Anton Scharl; Michael P Lux; Mathias W Beckmann; Sophia Scharl
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Efficacy of contemporary chemotherapy in stage IIIC endometrial cancer: a histologic dichotomy.

Authors:  Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez; Andrea Mariani; Sean C Dowdy; Amy L Weaver; Michaela E McGree; Janice R Martin; Gary L Keeney; Aminah Jatoi; Bobbie S Gostout; Karl C Podratz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Controversies in surgical staging of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  R Seracchioli; S Solfrini; M Mabrouk; C Facchini; N Di Donato; L Manuzzi; L Savelli; S Venturoli
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-06-23

9.  Adjuvant treatment and survival in obese women with endometrial cancer: an international collaborative study.

Authors:  Francesca Martra; Charles Kunos; Heidi Gibbons; Paolo Zola; Luciano Galletto; Robert DeBernardo; Vivian von Gruenigen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  A comparison of extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic or robotic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Janelle Pakish; Pamela T Soliman; Michael Frumovitz; Shannon N Westin; Kathleen M Schmeler; Ricardo Dos Reis; Mark F Munsell; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.