OBJECTIVES: To characterise discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses in patients who die in the intensive care unit. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Ten-bed closed mixed adult intensive care unit in a tertiary referral teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All the clinical notes and autopsy reports of 346 patients who died in the intensive care unit in 1996-2000. INTERVENTIONS: Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses were reviewed by two intensivists, a specialist in infectious diseases, a pathologist and an anaesthesiologist. New findings which would have changed current therapy in the intensive care unit were categorised as a Class I discrepancy, and those related to death but which would not have altered therapy as a Class II discrepancy. RESULTS: Of 2370 patients admitted, 388 (16.4%) died. An autopsy was performed in 346 (89%) of the deceased patients. A Class I discrepancy was found in 8 patients (2.3%) and a Class II discrepancy in 11 patients (3.2%). Five of the eight (62%) Class I discrepancies were infections which occurred in patients already treated for another infections. CONCLUSION: Despite the availability of advanced diagnostic facilities, especially infectious complications seem to remain undiagnosed. Autopsy is a valuable tool with which to monitor diagnostic accuracy in these patients.
OBJECTIVES: To characterise discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses in patients who die in the intensive care unit. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Ten-bed closed mixed adult intensive care unit in a tertiary referral teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All the clinical notes and autopsy reports of 346 patients who died in the intensive care unit in 1996-2000. INTERVENTIONS: Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses were reviewed by two intensivists, a specialist in infectious diseases, a pathologist and an anaesthesiologist. New findings which would have changed current therapy in the intensive care unit were categorised as a Class I discrepancy, and those related to death but which would not have altered therapy as a Class II discrepancy. RESULTS: Of 2370 patients admitted, 388 (16.4%) died. An autopsy was performed in 346 (89%) of the deceased patients. A Class I discrepancy was found in 8 patients (2.3%) and a Class II discrepancy in 11 patients (3.2%). Five of the eight (62%) Class I discrepancies were infections which occurred in patients already treated for another infections. CONCLUSION: Despite the availability of advanced diagnostic facilities, especially infectious complications seem to remain undiagnosed. Autopsy is a valuable tool with which to monitor diagnostic accuracy in these patients.
Authors: Kimberly J O'Malley; Karon F Cook; Matt D Price; Kimberly Raiford Wildes; John F Hurdle; Carol M Ashton Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: George Dimopoulos; Michael Piagnerelli; Jacques Berré; Isabelle Salmon; Jean-Louis Vincent Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Rob G H Driessen; Bartholomeus G H Latten; Dennis C J J Bergmans; Riquette P M G Hulsewe; Johanna W M Holtkamp; Iwan C C van der Horst; Bela Kubat; Ronny M Schnabel Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2020-12-11 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Sebastian O Decker; Annette Sigl; Christian Grumaz; Philip Stevens; Yevhen Vainshtein; Stefan Zimmermann; Markus A Weigand; Stefan Hofer; Kai Sohn; Thorsten Brenner Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2017-08-18 Impact factor: 5.923