Literature DB >> 12594424

Panoramic radiographs: a tool for investigating skeletal pattern.

M Okan Akcam1, Tunc Altiok, Erhan Ozdiler.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the possibility of enhancing the clinical versatility of the panoramic radiograph, which is an indispensable tool for dental diagnosis. The material of this study consisted of lateral cephalograms and panoramic radiographs obtained from 30 patients. A correlation test was performed between the parametric measurements, and the predictability level of the cephalometric measurements from panoramic radiograms was determined by using regression equations. The equations showed that the Go-Gn/S-N, ANS-PNS/Go-Me (palatal plane/mandibular plane), and Co-Go/Go-Me parameters could be predicted from panoramic radiographs within statistically significant levels, and their predictability levels were 20.6%, 15.6%, and 11.2%, respectively. Statistically significant correlations and predictability levels were also determined for the cephalometric and corresponding panoramic parameters in which Frankfort horizontal plane was used. It can be concluded that even though panoramic radiographs provide information on the vertical dimensions of craniofacial structures, clinicians should be vigilant when predicting skeletal cephalometric parameters from panoramic radiographs, because of their lower predictability percentages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12594424     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2003.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  10 in total

1.  Effects of Angle class II correction with the Forsus fatigue resistant device on mandibular third molars : A retrospective study.

Authors:  Belma I Aslan; Zühre Z Akarslan; Özge Karadağ
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Effect of premolar extraction on mandibular third molar impaction in young adults.

Authors:  Cağrı Türköz; Cağrı Ulusoy
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Comparison of gonial angle determination from cephalograms and orthopantomogram.

Authors:  Mandeep Kaur Bhullar; Amandeep Singh Uppal; Gulsheen Kaur Kochhar; Sanjay Chachra; Anuraj Singh Kochhar
Journal:  Indian J Dent       Date:  2014-07

4.  Comparison of Orthopantomogram and Lateral Cephalogram for Mandibular Measurements.

Authors:  S Saravana Kumar; V Thailavathy; Daya Srinivasan; Divya Loganathan; J Yamini
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2017-11

5.  TMD symptoms and vertical mandibular symmetry in young adult orthodontic patients in North Sumatra, Indonesia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ervina Sofyanti; Trelia Boel; Benny Soegiharto; Elza I Auerkari
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-06-04

6.  Panorametry: suggestion of a method for mandibular measurements on panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  Edela Puricelli
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 2.151

7.  Agreement between panoramic and lateral cephalometric radiographs for measuring the gonial angle.

Authors:  Maryam Zangouei-Booshehri; Hossein-Agha Aghili; Mojtaba Abasi; Fatemeh Ezoddini-Ardakani
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 0.212

8.  The influence of crossbite in early development of mandibular bone asymmetries in paediatric patients.

Authors:  Montserrat Diéguez-Pérez; M Joaquín de Nova-García; Mª Rosa Mourelle-Martínez; Cristina González-Aranda
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-09-01

9.  Assessment of the validity of orthopantomographs in the evaluation of mandibular steepness in Libya.

Authors:  Tayisir Ganeiber; Iman Bugaighis
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2018-06-06

10.  Gonial Angle by Lateral Cephalogram in Orthodontic Patients of a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Manju Bajracharya; Anjana Rajbhandari; Resina Pradhan; Pushkar Manandhar; Surendra Maharjan; Bashu Dev Pant
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 0.406

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.