Belma I Aslan1, Zühre Z Akarslan2, Özge Karadağ3. 1. Department of Orthodontics, Gazi University Dentistry Faculty, Ankara, Turkey. belmaslan2003@yahoo.com. 2. Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Gazi University Dentistry Faculty, Ankara, Turkey. 3. Faculty of Science, Department of Statistics, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The goal was to evaluate the effects of Angle class II malocclusion treatment using the Forsus fatigue resistant device (FRD, 3M, St. Paul, MN, USA) on the position and angulation of mandibular third molars and retromolar space. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 58 class II patients (mean age 13.6 ± 1.8 years) treated with the FRD (FRD group) were compared with 51 class I patients (mean age 13.5 ± 1.6 years) who underwent orthodontic treatment (control group). A total of 109 mandibular third molars in the FRD group and 91 in the control group were evaluated. Changes in the retromolar space, angulation of the second (ɣ) and third molars (β), and the angle between these teeth (α) were assessed with panoramic radiographs taken at the beginning and the end of the treatment. Data were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: At the end of the treatment, there were significant increases in ɣ and β in the FRD group and ɣ in the control group (p < 0.05). The decrease in α in the FRD group and increase in the control group were not significant (p > 0.05); however, this change led to a small significant change between the groups (p < 0.05). The retromolar space significantly increased in the FRD group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). No significant correlation was found between retromolar space and third molar uprighting in any of the groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Class II correction with FRD led to mesialization of the lower arch which provided an increase in the retromolar space. Little improvement in the uprighting of the third molars occurred.
PURPOSE: The goal was to evaluate the effects of Angle class II malocclusion treatment using the Forsus fatigue resistant device (FRD, 3M, St. Paul, MN, USA) on the position and angulation of mandibular third molars and retromolar space. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 58 class II patients (mean age 13.6 ± 1.8 years) treated with the FRD (FRD group) were compared with 51 class I patients (mean age 13.5 ± 1.6 years) who underwent orthodontic treatment (control group). A total of 109 mandibular third molars in the FRD group and 91 in the control group were evaluated. Changes in the retromolar space, angulation of the second (ɣ) and third molars (β), and the angle between these teeth (α) were assessed with panoramic radiographs taken at the beginning and the end of the treatment. Data were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: At the end of the treatment, there were significant increases in ɣ and β in the FRD group and ɣ in the control group (p < 0.05). The decrease in α in the FRD group and increase in the control group were not significant (p > 0.05); however, this change led to a small significant change between the groups (p < 0.05). The retromolar space significantly increased in the FRD group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). No significant correlation was found between retromolar space and third molar uprighting in any of the groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Class II correction with FRD led to mesialization of the lower arch which provided an increase in the retromolar space. Little improvement in the uprighting of the third molars occurred.
Entities:
Keywords:
Angle class II malocclusion; Eruption space; Fixed orthodontic appliances; Retromolar space; Third molar
Authors: Theodorus Dirk G Mettes; Hossein Ghaeminia; Marloes E L Nienhuijs; John Perry; Wil J M van der Sanden; Alphons Plasschaert Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2012-06-13