Literature DB >> 12594423

Comparison of radiographic and photographic measurement of mandibular asymmetry.

Raymond Edler1, David Wertheim, Darrel Greenhill.   

Abstract

This study compared measurement of mandibular asymmetry by digitization of mandibular outlines from standardized facial photographs and posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs. Four ratios were used in calculating asymmetry: area (relative size of right and left mandibular segments), perimeter or length of outlines, compactness (shape), and moment. The records of 28 patients with varying degrees of asymmetry were used. A significant relationship was found for 3 of the ratios (area, compactness, and moment) between measurements from photographs and radiographs. A further comparison showed that measurements from the radiographs correlated more closely with those from photographs when the mastoid processes were used as a baseline, rather than latero-orbitale. Repeatability of mandibular outline digitization proved satisfactory. Although digitization from standardized photographs is the preferred approach, the results indicated that posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs can be used similarly. Unlike other cephalometric analyses for mandibular asymmetry, this method avoids problems of landmark identification, thus presenting a clinically useful method of quantifying asymmetry, eg, in auditing the surgical-orthodontic correction of asymmetry or monitoring change over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12594423     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2003.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  9 in total

1.  Neural symmetry and functional asymmetry of the mandible.

Authors:  Guillaume Captier; Julien Lethuilier; Mohamed Oussaid; François Canovas; François Bonnel
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Use of (99m)Tc-MDP SPECT for assessment of mandibular growth: development of normal values.

Authors:  Frederic H Fahey; Zachary R Abramson; Bonnie L Padwa; Robert E Zimmerman; David Zurakowski; Mark Nissenbaum; Leonard B Kaban; S Ted Treves
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Non-Syndromal Facial Asymmetry.

Authors:  G K Thapliyal; T K Bandyopadhyay; S K Kaushik
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-05-30

Review 4.  Analysis of Facial Asymmetry.

Authors:  Kang Young Choi
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-10

5.  Reliability of reference distances used in photogrammetry.

Authors:  Muge Aksu; Demet Kaya; Ilken Kocadereli
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomographic image reorientation using soft tissues as reference for facial asymmetry diagnosis.

Authors:  Jae-Kyu Lee; Pil-Kyo Jung; Cheol-Hyun Moon
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Lateral cephalometric diagnosis of asymmetry in Angle Class II subdivision compared to Class I and II.

Authors:  Aparecida Fernanda Meloti; Renata de Cássia Gonçalves; Ertty Silva; Lídia Parsekian Martins; Ary dos Santos-Pinto
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

8.  Linear and Volumetric Mandibular Asymmetries in Adult Patients With Different Skeletal Classes and Vertical Patterns: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.

Authors:  Luz Victoria Mendoza; Carlos Bellot-Arcís; José María Montiel-Company; Verónica García-Sanz; José Manuel Almerich-Silla; Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The location of midfacial landmarks according to the method of establishing the midsagittal reference plane in three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of facial asymmetry.

Authors:  Min Sun Kim; Eun Joo Lee; In Ja Song; Jae-Seo Lee; Byung-Cheol Kang; Suk-Ja Yoon
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2015-12-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.