Literature DB >> 20033153

Use of (99m)Tc-MDP SPECT for assessment of mandibular growth: development of normal values.

Frederic H Fahey1, Zachary R Abramson, Bonnie L Padwa, Robert E Zimmerman, David Zurakowski, Mark Nissenbaum, Leonard B Kaban, S Ted Treves.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Planar scintigraphy using (99m)Tc-labeled methylene diphosphonate ((99m)Tc-MDP) has been established as a method for evaluating mandibular growth and asymmetry. However, (99m)Tc-MDP single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) provides improved image contrast and quantitative capability potentially allowing the clinician to make a more accurate assessment of the stage of activity of normal and asymmetric mandibular growth. The purpose of this study was to utilize (99m)Tc-MDP SPECT in normal subjects to develop a standardized approach to imaging the mandible that could subsequently be used to evaluate patients with potential for mandibular growth abnormalities.
METHODS: Thirty-two patients (22 females, 10 males, 8-25 years of age, mean of 14 years) having (99m)Tc-MDP bone scans (7.4 MBq/kg, maximum of 518 MBq) for indications not involving the head were asked to have an additional SPECT that included the mandibular condyles. Internal (clivus) and external (source of known activity included within the field of view) standards were both investigated. Two- and three-dimensional (2-D and 3-D) regions of interest (ROI) were drawn over each condyle and the clivus in a single slice containing the maximum pixel value within the structure. A 3-D ROI was also drawn about the external standard. Maximum and average pixel values within the 2-D and 3-D ROIs were recorded.
RESULTS: Correlation analysis indicated that essentially the same information was obtained whether the maximum or average pixel value within a 2-D or 3-D ROI was used. The right to left ratio provided a parameter that can be used to assess the magnitude of mandibular metabolic asymmetry. Use of an external standard provides the potential for quantifying condylar uptake for assessment of the activity of mandibular growth. Normal ranges for different age groups were determined for condylar uptake using both internal and external standards.
CONCLUSION: (99m)Tc-MDP SPECT provides a quantitative method for assessing mandibular condylar uptake as a reflection of the activity of mandibular growth. The maximum pixel value of a 2-D ROI using external standardization and the right to left ratio of the condylar uptake provide the potential for quantitative evaluation of patients with mandibular asymmetry. These parameters will be further evaluated in an upcoming clinical investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20033153     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-009-1337-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  24 in total

1.  Planar versus SPET imaging in the assessment of condylar growth.

Authors:  W L Chan; M G Carolan; V B Fernandes; D P Abbati
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.690

2.  Investigations on skeletal growth zones via bone scans as base of determination of optimal time for surgery in mandibular asymmetry.

Authors:  P Reuland; R Werz
Journal:  Nuklearmedizin       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.379

3.  Radionuclide bone scanning in the diagnosis of lesions of the maxillofacial region.

Authors:  J M Alexander
Journal:  J Oral Surg       Date:  1976-03

4.  Quantitative analysis of planar bone scintigraphy in patients with unilateral condylar hyperplasia.

Authors:  Carrol P Saridin; Pieter Raijmakers; Alfred G Becking
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2006-12-04

5.  Efficacy of high condylectomy for management of condylar hyperplasia.

Authors:  Larry M Wolford; Pushkar Mehra; Oscar Reiche-Fischel; Carlos A Morales-Ryan; Patricia García-Morales
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Quantitative bone scintigraphy using SPECT.

Authors:  D Front; O Israel; J Jerushalmi; A Frenkel; G Iosilevsky; M Feinsod; G M Kolodny
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Bone scans and the timing of treatment for condylar hyperplasia.

Authors:  P D Robinson; K Harris; K C Coghlan; K Altman
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.789

8.  Assessment of mandibular growth by skeletal scintigraphy.

Authors:  L B Kaban; G J Cisneros; S Heyman; S Treves
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Computerized skeletal scintigraphy for assessment of mandibular asymmetry.

Authors:  G J Cisneros; L B Kaban
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Surgery in mandibular condylar hyperplasia.

Authors:  G Hampf; A Tasanen; S Nordling
Journal:  J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1985-04
View more
  4 in total

1.  Congenital and acquired mandibular asymmetry: Mapping growth and remodeling in 3 dimensions.

Authors:  R Christian Solem; Antonio Ruellas; Joni L Ricks-Oddie; Katherine Kelly; Snehlata Oberoi; Janice Lee; Arthur Miller; Lucia Cevidanes
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  The cervical vertebral maturation method: A user's guide.

Authors:  James A McNamara; Lorenzo Franchi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  SPECT/CT Correlation in the Diagnosis of Unilateral Condilar Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Diego Fernando López; Valentina Ríos Borrás; Juan Manuel Muñoz; Rodrigo Cardenas-Perilla; Luis Eduardo Almeida
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-08

4.  Growth trends analysis of unilateral condylar hyperplasia followed up with planar scintigraphy: Retrospective overview of 249 cases.

Authors:  Pingan Liu; Jun Shi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.