PURPOSE: Radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) is an emerging technique in the treatment of focal hepatic tumors. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) are currently used to monitor hepatic tumors after RFA for residual disease and recurrence. Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is an excellent imaging method for the detection of liver metastases, but it has not been thoroughly evaluated as an alternative to anatomic imaging in the surveillance of liver tumors treated with RFA. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the role of FDG-PET imaging in the surveillance of liver tumors treated with RFA. METHODS: Thirteen patients with histories of malignant tumors of the liver treated with RFA and who had received post-treatment FDG-PET scans were assessed retrospectively. One patient had two post-RFA FDG-PET scans, eight patients had concurrent MRI scans, and six patients had concurrent CT scans. Imaging findings were compared with the results of clinical follow-up. RESULTS: There were either recurrent tumors at the ablation site (8 patients) or new metastases (3 patients) in 11 patients. FDG-PET identified all 11 cases and did not misidentify any cases. Of the seven patients with positive PET findings who received an MRI scan, three were also positive on MRI (42.9%); the other four cases were either negative or equivocal. Of the four patients with positive PET findings who received a CT scan, only two had positive CT scan findings (50%). All recurrences diagnosed by PET were confirmed on clinical follow-up. CONCLUSION: In this preliminary study, FDG-PET was superior to anatomic imaging in the surveillance of patients treated with RFA for malignant hepatic tumors.
PURPOSE: Radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) is an emerging technique in the treatment of focal hepatic tumors. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) are currently used to monitor hepatic tumors after RFA for residual disease and recurrence. Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is an excellent imaging method for the detection of liver metastases, but it has not been thoroughly evaluated as an alternative to anatomic imaging in the surveillance of liver tumors treated with RFA. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the role of FDG-PET imaging in the surveillance of liver tumors treated with RFA. METHODS: Thirteen patients with histories of malignant tumors of the liver treated with RFA and who had received post-treatment FDG-PET scans were assessed retrospectively. One patient had two post-RFA FDG-PET scans, eight patients had concurrent MRI scans, and six patients had concurrent CT scans. Imaging findings were compared with the results of clinical follow-up. RESULTS: There were either recurrent tumors at the ablation site (8 patients) or new metastases (3 patients) in 11 patients. FDG-PET identified all 11 cases and did not misidentify any cases. Of the seven patients with positive PET findings who received an MRI scan, three were also positive on MRI (42.9%); the other four cases were either negative or equivocal. Of the four patients with positive PET findings who received a CT scan, only two had positive CT scan findings (50%). All recurrences diagnosed by PET were confirmed on clinical follow-up. CONCLUSION: In this preliminary study, FDG-PET was superior to anatomic imaging in the surveillance of patients treated with RFA for malignant hepatic tumors.
Authors: Brian J Fahey; Rendon C Nelson; Stephen J Hsu; David P Bradway; Douglas M Dumont; Gregg E Trahey Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2008-05-09 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Marc Friedman; Igor Mikityansky; Anthony Kam; Steven K Libutti; McClellan M Walther; Ziv Neeman; Julia K Locklin; Bradford J Wood Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2004-06-03 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: D Laganà; G Carrafiello; M Mangini; D Lumia; L Mocciardini; C Chini; G Pinotti; S Cuffari; C Fugazzola Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2008-02-25 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Laura L Travaini; Giuseppe Trifirò; Laura Ravasi; Lorenzo Monfardini; Paolo Della Vigna; Guido Bonomo; Antonio Chiappa; Andrew Mallia; Mahila Ferrari; Franco Orsi; Giovanni Paganelli Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2008-03-13 Impact factor: 9.236