Literature DB >> 12591983

Health-related quality-of-life measurement in randomized clinical trials in breast cancer--taking stock.

Pamela J Goodwin1, Jeanne T Black, Louise J Bordeleau, Patricia A Ganz.   

Abstract

Measurement of health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) in randomized clinical trials in breast cancer has become common. In this review, we take stock of the contribution that HRQOL measurement in breast cancer clinical trials makes to clinical decision making regarding selection of optimal treatment. A series of MEDLINE searches was conducted to identify all randomized trials in breast cancer that included self-reported HRQOL or psychosocial outcomes. A total of 256 citations were identified that included HRQOL or psychosocial outcomes in breast cancer patients, and 66 of these involved randomized clinical trials of treatment. These 66 reports of breast cancer clinical trials of treatment are discussed in this review. Forty-six of the trials evaluated biomedical interventions, and 20 evaluated psychosocial interventions. Among the biomedical trials, eight trials evaluated HRQOL in primary management of breast cancer, seven trials evaluated HRQOL in adjuvant therapy of breast cancer patients, 20 trials involved metastatic breast cancer, eight trials involved symptom control/supportive care, and three trials evaluated different approaches to investigation or follow-up of breast cancer patients. Among the psychosocial trials, 13 trials evaluated HRQOL in adjuvant therapy of breast cancer patients, and their partners or spouses, six trials involved metastatic breast cancer, and one trial focused on symptom control. We found that the contribution of HRQOL measurement to clinical decision making depended on the clinical setting. In primary management of breast cancer, where medical outcomes of several treatment options are equivalent, HRQOL measurement provided added information for clinical decision making beyond that of traditional medical outcomes. In trials in the adjuvant setting, HRQOL measurement did not influence clinical decision making. In metastatic disease, HRQOL outcomes provided little information beyond that obtained from traditional medical outcomes, including toxicity. In the symptom control/supportive care setting, results of HRQOL questionnaires targeting specific symptoms (e.g., emesis) guided treatment decisions. In psychosocial intervention trials, psychosocial and/or HRQOL measurements often provided the only outcome information; therefore, selection of instruments that captured attributes likely to be altered by the intervention was essential. Until results of ongoing trials in breast cancer are available, caution is recommended in initiating new HRQOL studies unless treatment equivalency is expected, or unless the HRQOL questions target unique or specific issues that can only be addressed through patient self-report, including outcomes of psychosocial interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12591983     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/95.4.263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  63 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life before and after a breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Amy Trentham-Dietz; Brian L Sprague; Ronald Klein; Barbara E K Klein; Karen J Cruickshanks; Dennis G Fryback; John M Hampton
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Quality of life assessment in surgical oncology trials.

Authors:  Kerry Avery; Jane M Blazeby
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Mapping PROMIS Global Health Items to EuroQol (EQ-5D) Utility Scores Using Linear and Equipercentile Equating.

Authors:  Nicolas R Thompson; Brittany R Lapin; Irene L Katzan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Responsiveness to change [corrected] due to supportive-expressive group therapy, improvement in mood and disease progression in women with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Julie Lemieux; Dorcas E Beaton; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Louise J Bordeleau; Jon Hunter; Pamela J Goodwin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Disparities in the survivorship experience among Latina survivors of breast cancer.

Authors:  Tinuke O Olagunju; Yihang Liu; Li-Jung Liang; James M Stomber; Jennifer J Griggs; Patricia A Ganz; Amardeep Thind; Rose C Maly
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Sleep duration and breast cancer prognosis: perspectives from the Women's Healthy Eating and Living Study.

Authors:  Catherine R Marinac; Sandahl H Nelson; Shirley W Flatt; Loki Natarajan; John P Pierce; Ruth E Patterson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Physical Activity and Lymphedema (the PAL trial): assessing the safety of progressive strength training in breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Kathryn H Schmitz; Andrea B Troxel; Andrea Cheville; Lorita L Grant; Cathy J Bryan; Cynthia R Gross; Leslie A Lytle; Rehana L Ahmed
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Influence of explanatory and confounding variables on HRQoL after controlling for measurement bias and response shift in measurement.

Authors:  Pranav K Gandhi; L Douglas Ried; Carole L Kimberlin; Teresa L Kauf; I-Chan Huang
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  Health-related quality of life in women previously treated for early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Wayne A Bardwell; Jacqueline M Major; Cheryl L Rock; Vicky A Newman; Cynthia A Thomson; Janice A Chilton; Joel E Dimsdale; John P Pierce
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 10.  Measuring outcomes in oncology treatment: the importance of patient-centered outcomes.

Authors:  Aundrea Oliver; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.