Literature DB >> 125914

Towards a better understanding of low-back pain: a review of the mechanics of the lumbar disc.

A Nachemson.   

Abstract

By measurement of intradiscal pressure in vitro, the hydrostatic properties of the nucleus pulposus of normal lumbar intervertebral disc was established. The stress distribution within normal discs subjected to vertical load was also explained, demonstrating the high tangential strains occurring in the posterior part of the annulus fibrosus. Intravitally performed measurements of disc pressure have demonstrated how the load on the lumbar disc varies according to the position of the subject's body. Compared to the pressure or load in the upright standing position, reclining reduces the pressure by 70%, while unsupported sitting increases the load by 40% and forward leaning and weight lifting by more than 100%. Similar relatively large augmentations of the load were observed in subjects performing various commonly used muscle-strengthening exercises. Measurement of intradiscal pressure is instrumental in explaining, from a mechanical point, the occurrence of posterior ruptures in the lumbar discs, and provides a basis for the rational treatment of patients with low-back pain in so far as these exhibit increase of pain on increased mechanical loads. For the majority of patients with low-back pain, the cause is unknown, although most evidence so far presented links the lumbar intervertebral disc to the pain syndromes. Results of recent studies have shown that both chemical and mechanical factors are probably of importance. So far we cannot successfully treat the chemical part of the disc syndrome. Since all our patients exhibit more pain when the spine is mechanically loaded, knowledge gained from intravital disc-pressure measurements provides a basis for successfully treating the mechanical part of the condition. Since none of the frequently prescribed and more spectacular remedies has ever been proved statistically superior to any of the others, it is most fair to our patients and to ourselves to use simpler, less expensive, and less dangerous programmes, such as bed-rest, administration of salicylates, and proper ergonomic advice. Based on a scientific approach, the low-back-pain school is intended to help the patient to be able to cope with these back troubles, to avoid excess therapy, and to decrease the cost both for the individual and for Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 125914     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/14.3.129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Rehabil        ISSN: 0300-3396


  38 in total

1.  Back pain.

Authors:  B Beaumont; E Paice
Journal:  Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1992-12

2.  RT97- and calcitonin gene-related peptide-like immunoreactivity in lumbar intervertebral discs and adjacent tissue from the rat.

Authors:  P W McCarthy; P Petts; A Hamilton
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  On how nucleus-endplate integration is achieved at the fibrillar level in the ovine lumbar disc.

Authors:  Kelly R Wade; Peter A Robertson; Neil D Broom
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Prevalence and risk factors of low back pain among nurses in a typical Nigerian hospital.

Authors:  L Sikiru; S Hanifa
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 0.927

5.  Age-related changes in human cervical, thoracal and lumbar intervertebral disc exhibit a strong intra-individual correlation.

Authors:  C Weiler; M Schietzsch; T Kirchner; A G Nerlich; N Boos; K Wuertz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  A survey of post-operative management for patients following first time lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  Esther Williamson; Louise White; Alison Rushton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Daily spinal mechanical loading as a risk factor for acute non-specific low back pain: a case-control study using the 24-Hour Schedule.

Authors:  Eric W P Bakker; Arianne P Verhagen; Cees Lucas; Hans J C M F Koning; Rob J de Haan; Bart W Koes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Scientific basis for the treatment of low back pain.

Authors:  R C Mulholland
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Reconstruction of a human ligamentous lumbar spine using CT images--a three-dimensional finite element mesh generation.

Authors:  C Breau; A Shirazi-Adl; J de Guise
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Sensitivity of notochordal disc cells to mechanical loading: an experimental animal study.

Authors:  Thorsten Guehring; Andreas Nerlich; Markus Kroeber; Wiltrud Richter; Georg W Omlor
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.