Literature DB >> 12590219

Accuracy of thoracic vertebral body screw placement using standard fluoroscopy, fluoroscopic image guidance, and computed tomographic image guidance: a cadaver study.

Sohail K Mirza1, Gregory C Wiggins, Charles Kuntz, Julie E York, Carlo Bellabarba, Mark A Knonodi, Jens R Chapman, Christopher I Shaffrey.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A surgical simulation study in human cadaver spine specimens was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of thoracic vertebral body screw placement using four different intraoperative imaging techniques.
OBJECTIVE: To compare standard fluoroscopy, fluoroscopy-based image guidance with two different referencing methods, and computed tomography-based image guidance by the measuring the time required for screw placement, the radiation exposure to specimen and surgeon, and the accuracy of screw position in the thoracic spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Image guidance provides additional anatomic information to the surgeon and may improve safety of technically difficult surgical procedures. The placement of screws in the thoracic spine is a technically demanding procedure in which inaccurate screw positioning places the spinal cord, nerve roots, and paraspinal structures such as the aorta and pleural space at risk for injury. Image-guided surgery may improve the accuracy of thoracic screw placement.
METHODS: Using four different intraoperative imaging methods, two experienced surgeons placed 337 vertebral body screws through the pedicles of thoracic vertebrae in 20 human cadaver thoracic spine specimens. The specimens then were examined with radiographs, computed tomography, and anatomic dissection to determine screw position. Measurements included procedure setup and screw insertion time, radiation exposure to the specimen, the surgeon's hand, the surgeon's body, frequency, direction, and magnitude of screw perforation through the cortical margins of thoracic vertebrae.
RESULTS: As compared with surgery using standard fluoroscopy, fluoroscopy-based image guidance that uses multiple reference marks and computed tomography-based image guidance improves the accuracy of thoracic vertebral body screws, but increases the time required for screw placement and the specimen radiation exposure. Exposure to radiation is minimal at the surgeon's body level and dependent on surgical technique at the surgeon's hand level. Screw perforation occurs most frequently in the lateral direction.
CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroscopy-based image guidance that uses only a single reference marker for the entire thoracic spine is highly inaccurate and unsafe. Systems with registration based on the instrumented vertebrae provide more accurate placement of thoracic vertebral body screws than standard fluoroscopy, but expose the patient to more radiation and require more time for screw insertion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12590219     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000048461.51308.CD

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  51 in total

Review 1.  Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Nai-Feng Tian; Qi-Shan Huang; Ping Zhou; Yang Zhou; Rui-Kai Wu; Yi Lou; Hua-Zi Xu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  CT accuracy of percutaneous versus open pedicle screw techniques: a series of 1609 screws.

Authors:  Todd M Chapman; Daniel J Blizzard; Christopher R Brown
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  O-arm(®)-based spinal navigation and intraoperative 3D-imaging: first experiences.

Authors:  O Gonschorek; S Hauck; U Spiegl; T Weiß; R Pätzold; V Bühren
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  An evaluation of image-guided technologies in the placement of anterior thoracic vertebral body screws in spinal trauma: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Alexander R Vaccaro; Philip S Yuan; Harvey E Smith; Jonathon Hott; Rick Sasso; Stephen Papadopoulos
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Pedicle screw insertion: computed tomography versus fluoroscopic image guidance.

Authors:  Tsai-Sheng Fu; Chak-Bor Wong; Tsung-Ting Tsai; Yen-Chiu Liang; Lih-Huei Chen; Wen-Jer Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nai-Feng Tian; Hua-Zi Xu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Image-guided spine surgery: state of the art and future directions.

Authors:  Thorsten Tjardes; Sven Shafizadeh; Dieter Rixen; Thomas Paffrath; Bertil Bouillon; Eva S Steinhausen; Holger Baethis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Benefit and accuracy of intraoperative 3D-imaging after pedicle screw placement: a prospective study in stabilizing thoracolumbar fractures.

Authors:  Markus Beck; Thomas Mittlmeier; Philip Gierer; Christoph Harms; Georg Gradl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in posterior scoliosis surgery: a comparison between intraoperative navigation and preoperative navigation techniques.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Tomoyuki Takigawa; YongGang Wu; Yoshihisa Sugimoto; Masato Tanaka; Toshifumi Ozaki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  [Operative treatment of traumatic fractures of the thorax and lumbar spine. Part II: surgical treatment and radiological findings].

Authors:  M Reinhold; C Knop; R Beisse; L Audigé; F Kandziora; A Pizanis; R Pranzl; E Gercek; M Schultheiss; A Weckbach; V Bühren; M Blauth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.