Literature DB >> 12589331

Expanding portion sizes in the US marketplace: implications for nutrition counseling.

Lisa R Young1, Marion Nestle.   

Abstract

The greater energy content of larger food portions could be contributing to the increasing prevalence of overweight. Prevention guidelines recommend "sensible" portion sizes but do not define them. The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) defines standard serving sizes for dietary guidance, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) defines standard servings for food labels. To use these standards in counseling, nutritionists must know the sizes of portions available in the marketplace. We determined marketplace portion sizes, identified changes in these sizes with time, and compared current marketplace portions with federal standards. Most marketplace portions exceed standard serving sizes by at least a factor of 2 and sometimes 8-fold. Portions have increased over time; those offered by fast-food chains, for example, often are 2 to 5 times larger than the original size. The discrepancy between marketplace portions and standard servings suggests the need for greater emphasis on the relationship of portion size to energy intake as a factor in weight maintenance.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12589331     DOI: 10.1053/jada.2003.50027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8223


  56 in total

1.  Food Away from Home and Childhood Obesity.

Authors:  Lisa Mancino; Jessica E Todd; Joanne Guthrie; Biing-Hwan Lin
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2014-12

2.  An ecological approach to understanding contributions to disparities in diabetes prevention and care.

Authors:  Debra Haire-Joshu; Chris Fleming
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 3.  Parental influence on eating behavior: conception to adolescence.

Authors:  Jennifer S Savage; Jennifer Orlet Fisher; Leann L Birch
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.718

4.  Brain response to food cues varying in portion size is associated with individual differences in the portion size effect in children.

Authors:  Kathleen L Keller; Laural K English; S Nicole Fearnbach; Marlou Lasschuijt; Kaitlin Anderson; Maria Bermudez; Jennifer O Fisher; Barbara J Rolls; Stephen J Wilson
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 5.  Environmental influences on development of type 2 diabetes and obesity: challenges in personalizing prevention and management.

Authors:  Abby G Ershow
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

6.  One portion size of foods frequently consumed by Korean adults.

Authors:  Mi-Kyeong Choi; Wha-Jin Hyun; Sim-Yeol Lee; Hong-Ju Park; Se-Na Kim; Kyung-Hee Song
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 1.926

Review 7.  Portion size and obesity.

Authors:  M Barbara E Livingstone; L Kirsty Pourshahidi
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 8.701

8.  Portion size: review and framework for interventions.

Authors:  Ingrid Hm Steenhuis; Willemijn M Vermeer
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  Efficacy of a meal replacement diet plan compared to a food-based diet plan after a period of weight loss and weight maintenance: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lisa M Davis; Christopher Coleman; Jessica Kiel; Joni Rampolla; Tammy Hutchisen; Laura Ford; Wayne S Andersen; Andrea Hanlon-Mitola
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.271

10.  Effects of calorie labeling and value size pricing on fast food meal choices: results from an experimental trial.

Authors:  Lisa J Harnack; Simone A French; J Michael Oakes; Mary T Story; Robert W Jeffery; Sarah A Rydell
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.