Literature DB >> 12588498

Fracture reasons in ceramic-fused-to-metal restorations.

M Ozcan1.   

Abstract

Ceramic-fused-to-metal restorations are widely used in dentistry with a high degree of general success. Fracture of the ceramic veneers as a result of oral function or trauma is not an uncommon problem in clinical practice. Although fractures of such restorations do not necessarily mean the failure of the restoration, the renewal process is both costly and time consuming and therefore remains a clinical problem. Fractures in the anterior region pose an aesthetic problem but when they are in the posterior, chewing function could also be affected. The published literature reveals that reasons for failures cover a wide spectrum from iatrogenic factors to laboratory mistakes or because of factors related to the inherent structure of the ceramics or simply to trauma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12588498     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01038.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  16 in total

1.  Confocal Raman microscopy and SEM/EDS investigations of the interface between the zirconia core and veneering ceramic: the influence of a liner and regeneration firing.

Authors:  Jean-Cédric Durand; Bruno Jacquot; Hamideh Salehi; Jacques Margerit; Frédéric J G Cuisinier
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Fracture behavior of metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses with frameworks from cast or a newly developed sintered cobalt-chromium alloy.

Authors:  Klaus-Peter Krug; Andreas W Knauber; Frank P Nothdurft
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Microshear bond strength of self-adhesive composite to ceramic after mechanical, chemical and laser surface treatments.

Authors:  Maryam Ghavam; Marjan Soleimanpour; Sedighe Sadat Hashemikamangar; Hooman Ebrahimi; Mohammad Javad Kharazifard
Journal:  Laser Ther       Date:  2017-12-31

4.  Evaluation of shear bond strengths of gingiva-colored composite resin to porcelain, metal and zirconia substrates.

Authors:  Hong-Seok An; Ji-Man Park; Eun-Jin Park
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment.

Authors:  Ashish Kalra; Murali S Mohan; E Mahesh Gowda
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

6.  Shear bond strength of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin for lithium disilicate-reinforced CAD/CAM ceramic material.

Authors:  Ugur Erdemir; Hande Sar Sancakli; Erkan Sancakli; Meltem Mert Eren; Sevda Ozel; Taner Yucel; Esra Yildiz
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  A comparative study on the bond strength of porcelain to the millingable Pd-Ag alloy.

Authors:  Jun-Tae Hong; Soo-Yeon Shin
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  All-ceramic and porcelain-fused-to-metal fixed partial dentures: a comparative study by 2D finite element analyses.

Authors:  Andréa Barreira Motta; Luiz Carlos Pereira; Andréia R C C da Cunha
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.698

9.  Shear Bond Strengths between Three Different Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Dental Materials and Veneering Ceramic and Their Susceptibility to Autoclave Induced Low-Temperature Degradation.

Authors:  Manoti Sehgal; Akshay Bhargava; Sharad Gupta; Prateek Gupta
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2016-05-12

10.  Porcelain repair - Influence of different systems and surface treatments on resin bond strength.

Authors:  Ji-Young Yoo; Hyung-In Yoon; Ji-Man Park; Eun-Jin Park
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 1.904

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.