Literature DB >> 12588271

Association of serum digoxin concentration and outcomes in patients with heart failure.

Saif S Rathore1, Jeptha P Curtis, Yongfei Wang, Michael R Bristow, Harlan M Krumholz.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG) trial reported that digoxin provided no overall mortality benefit and only a modest reduction in hospitalizations among patients with heart failure and depressed left ventricular systolic function. The clinical outcomes associated with digoxin therapy at different serum concentrations in the DIG trial have not been assessed.
OBJECTIVE: To assess variations in serum digoxin concentration (SDC) and their association with mortality and hospitalization in patients with heart failure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Post hoc analysis of the randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled DIG trial, conducted from August 1991 to December 1995, with the main analysis restricted to men with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 45% or less (n = 3782). Patients randomly assigned to receive digoxin were divided into 3 groups based on SDC at 1 month (0.5-0.8 ng/mL, n = 572; 0.9-1.1 ng/mL, n = 322; and > or =1.2 ng/mL, n = 277) and compared with patients randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 2611). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: All-cause mortality at a mean follow-up of 37 months.
RESULTS: Higher SDCs were associated with increased crude all-cause mortality rates (0.5-0.8 ng/mL, 29.9%; 0.9-1.1 ng/mL, 38.8%; and > or =1.2 ng/mL, 48.0%; P =.006 for trend). Patients with SDCs of 0.5 to 0.8 ng/mL had a 6.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1%-10.5%) lower mortality rate compared with patients receiving placebo. Digoxin was not associated with a reduction in mortality among patients with SDCs of 0.9 to 1.1 ng/mL (2.6% increase; 95% CI, - 3.0% to 8.3%), whereas patients with SDCs of 1.2 ng/mL and higher had an 11.8% (95% CI, 5.7%-18.0%) higher absolute mortality rate than patients receiving placebo. The association between SDC and mortality persisted after multivariable adjustment (SDC 0.5-0.8 ng/mL hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, 95% CI, 0.68-0.94; SDC 0.9-1.1 ng/mL HR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.74-1.08; SDC > or =1.2 ng/mL HR 1.16, 95% CI, 0.96-1.39; and HR of 1.00 [referent] for placebo).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that higher SDCs were associated with increased mortality and suggest that the effectiveness of digoxin therapy in men with heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 45% or less may be optimized in the SDC range of 0.5 to 0.8 ng/mL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12588271     DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.7.871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  123 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacologic modulation of parasympathetic activity in heart failure.

Authors:  Monali Y Desai; Mari A Watanabe; Abhay A Laddu; Paul J Hauptman
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Therapeutic ranges of serum digoxin concentrations in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Zachary D Goldberger; Ary L Goldberger
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Reduction of Na/K-ATPase potentiates marinobufagenin-induced cardiac dysfunction and myocyte apoptosis.

Authors:  Changxuan Liu; Yan Bai; Yiliang Chen; Yu Wang; Yoann Sottejeau; Lijun Liu; Xiaomei Li; Jerry B Lingrel; Deepak Malhotra; Christopher J Cooper; Joseph I Shapiro; Zi-jian Xie; Jiang Tian
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Systolic heart failure in the elderly: optimizing medical management.

Authors:  Jonathan P Man; Bodh I Jugdutt
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 5.  Comprehensive review of cardiovascular toxicity of drugs and related agents.

Authors:  Přemysl Mladěnka; Lenka Applová; Jiří Patočka; Vera Marisa Costa; Fernando Remiao; Jana Pourová; Aleš Mladěnka; Jana Karlíčková; Luděk Jahodář; Marie Vopršalová; Kurt J Varner; Martin Štěrba
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 12.944

Review 6.  Autonomic changes in patients with heart failure and in post-myocardial infarction patients.

Authors:  M P Frenneaux
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 7.  Cardiovascular drug therapy in elderly patients: specific age-related pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and therapeutic considerations.

Authors:  Arduino A Mangoni
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 8.  Digitalis for treatment of heart failure in patients in sinus rhythm.

Authors:  William B Hood; Antonio L Dans; Gordon H Guyatt; Roman Jaeschke; John J V McMurray
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-04-28

Review 9.  Benefit-risk assessment of dronedarone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Ahmed M A Adlan; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 10.  Contemporary Controversies in Digoxin Use in Systolic Heart Failure.

Authors:  Chonyang L Albert; Forum Kamdar; Mazen Hanna
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2016-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.