Literature DB >> 12588116

The morphology of islets within the porcine donor pancreas determines the isolation result: successful isolation of pancreatic islets can now be achieved from young market pigs.

Mareike Krickhahn1, Christoph Bühler, Thomas Meyer, Arnulf Thiede, Karin Ulrichs.   

Abstract

Clinical islet allotransplantation has become an increasingly efficient "routine" therapy in recent years. Shortage of human donor organs leads to porcine pancreatic islets as a potential source for islet xenotransplantation. Yet it is still very difficult to isolate sufficient numbers of intact porcine islets, particularly from young market pigs. In the following study islets were successfully isolated from retired breeders [4806 +/- 720 islet equivalents per gram organ (IEQ/g); n = 25; 2-3 years old; RB] and also from young hybrid pigs [2868 +/- 260 IEQ/g; n = 65; 4-6 months old; HY] using LiberasePI and a modified version of Ricordi's digestion-filtration technique. As expected, isolations from RB showed significantly better results (p < 0.002). A retrospective histological analysis of almost all donor pancreases showed that the majority of organs from RB (80%) contained mainly large islets (diameter > 200 microm), in contrast to only 35% of all pancreases from HY. Remarkably, the islet size in situ, regardless whether detected in RB or HY, strongly determined the isolation result. A donor organ with predominantly large islets resulted in significantly higher numbers of IEQs compared with a donor organ with predominantly small islets [RB(Large Islets): 5680 +/- 3,318 IEQ/g (n= 20); RB(Small Islets): 1353 +/- 427 IEQ/g (n = 5); p < 0.02]. In addition, isolation results were strongly influenced by the quality of the LiberasePI batch, and therefore single batch testing is invariably required. Purification was performed using Ficoll or OptiPrep density gradient centrifugation manually or in the COBE cell processor. Although islet purity was highest when OptiPrep was used, final islet yields did not differ between the different purification methods. Our study demonstrates that islet size in situ is an extremely critical parameter for highly successful islet isolation; consequently, we are now performing a morphological screening of each donor organ prior to the isolation process. Under these conditions highly successful isolations can reliably be performed even from young market pigs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12588116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Transplant        ISSN: 0963-6897            Impact factor:   4.064


  9 in total

1.  Human islet mass, morphology, and survival after cryopreservation using the Edmonton protocol.

Authors:  Priya M Miranda; Viswanathan Mohan; Sekhar Ganthimathy; Ranjit M Anjana; S Gunasekaran; Venkatachalam Thiagarajan; Thomas A Churchill; Tatsuya Kin; A M James Shapiro; Jonathan R T Lakey
Journal:  Islets       Date:  2013 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 2.  Optimal pig donor selection in islet xenotransplantation: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Hai-tao Zhu; Liang Yu; Yi Lyu; Bo Wang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  Suitability of human juvenile pancreatic islets for clinical use.

Authors:  A N Balamurugan; Y Chang; S Bertera; A Sands; V Shankar; M Trucco; R Bottino
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2006-06-17       Impact factor: 10.122

4.  Rapid quantitative assessment of the pig pancreas biopsy predicts islet yield.

Authors:  T Anazawa; A N Balamurugan; S Matsumoto; S A Lafreniere; T D O'Brien; D E R Sutherland; B J Hering
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  Pig pancreas anatomy: implications for pancreas procurement, preservation, and islet isolation.

Authors:  Joana Ferrer; William E Scott; Bradley P Weegman; Thomas M Suszynski; David E R Sutherland; Bernhard J Hering; Klearchos K Papas
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Pig-to-monkey islet xenotransplantation using multi-transgenic pigs.

Authors:  R Bottino; M Wijkstrom; D J van der Windt; H Hara; M Ezzelarab; N Murase; S Bertera; J He; C Phelps; D Ayares; D K C Cooper; M Trucco
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 7.  Pig-islet xenotransplantation: recent progress and current perspectives.

Authors:  Hai-Tao Zhu; Wan-Li Wang; Liang Yu; Bo Wang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2014-03-24

8.  A comprehensive microbiological safety approach for agarose encapsulated porcine islets intended for clinical trials.

Authors:  Lawrence S Gazda; James Collins; Archie Lovatt; Robert W Holdcraft; Merribeth J Morin; Daniel Galbraith; Melanie Graham; Melissa A Laramore; Christine Maclean; John Black; Euan W Milne; Douglas G Marthaler; Horatiu V Vinerean; Michelle M Michalak; Deborah Hoffer; Steven Richter; Richard D Hall; Barry H Smith
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.907

9.  Bioabsorption of Subcutaneous Nanofibrous Scaffolds Influences the Engraftment and Function of Neonatal Porcine Islets.

Authors:  Purushothaman Kuppan; Sandra Kelly; Karen Seeberger; Chelsea Castro; Mandy Rosko; Andrew R Pepper; Gregory S Korbutt
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.329

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.