Literature DB >> 12585953

Restoring balance to industry-academia relationships in an era of institutional financial conflicts of interest: promoting research while maintaining trust.

Michael M E Johns1, Mark Barnes, Patrik S Florencio.   

Abstract

Economic partnerships between industry and academia accelerate medical innovation and enhance patient access to medical advances, but such partnerships have sometimes eroded public trust in the research enterprise. There is particular risk for conflict of interest when economic partnerships extend beyond a university's corporate interests to involve institutional decision makers. Institutions and institutional decision makers should fully disclose industry-related financial interests and relationships. Without legitimate justification for such interests, individuals should divest themselves from these interests or recuse themselves from responsibility for research oversight. Management of institutional partnerships also might entail the physical separation of certain facilities, the placement of restrictions on information shared between investment and research staffs, and provision of oversight by independent review panels made up of persons who have expertise in intellectual property, finance, and research, but who are not financially or otherwise dependent on the institution. Through these means, it is possible to restore balance to industry-academia relationships, thereby promoting progress while maintaining public trust in research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12585953     DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.6.741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  18 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Walter J Hogan
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2003-06

2.  Conflict of interest policies and disclosure requirements among European Society of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Journals.

Authors:  F Alfonso; A Timmis; F J Pinto; G Ambrosio; H Ector; P Kulakowski; P Vardas
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  Orthopaedic surgeons and industry: the value proposition.

Authors:  John J Callaghan; Steve S Liu
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2010

4.  Resident and faculty perceptions of conflict of interest in medical education.

Authors:  Peter Y Watson; Akshay K Khandelwal; Joseph L Musial; John D Buckley
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Origin and funding of the most frequently cited papers in medicine: database analysis.

Authors:  Nikolaos A Patsopoulos; John P A Ioannidis; Apostolos A Analatos
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-17

6.  Awareness of authorship criteria and conflict: survey in a medical institution in India.

Authors:  Upreet Dhaliwal; Navjeevan Singh; Arati Bhatia
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-12-12

7.  A question of method. The ethics of managing conflicts of interest.

Authors:  Samia A Hurst; Alex Mauron
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 8.807

8.  Scientific self-regulation-so good, how can it fail? Commentary on "The problems with forbidding science".

Authors:  Patrick L Taylor
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Citizen expectations of 'academic entrepreneurship' in health research: public science, practical benefit.

Authors:  Fiona A Miller; Michael Painter-Main; Renata Axler; Pascale Lehoux; Mita Giacomini; Barbara Slater
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  The role of entrepreneurial activities in academic pharmaceutical science research.

Authors:  Audra L Stinchcomb
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.