Literature DB >> 12585665

The Italian multi-centre project on evaluation of MRI and other imaging modalities in early detection of breast cancer in subjects at high genetic risk.

F Podo1, F Sardanelli, R Canese, G D'Agnolo, P G Natali, M Crecco, M L Grandinetti, R Musumeci, G Trecate, S Bergonzi, T De Simone, C Costa, B Pasini, S Manuokian, G B Spatti, D Vergnaghi, S Morassut, M Boiocchi, R Dolcetti, A Viel, C De Giacomi, A Veronesi, F Coran, V Silingardi, D Turchett, L Cortesi, M De Santis, M Federico, R Romagnoli, S Ferrari, G Bevilacqua, C Bartolozzi, M A Caligo, A Cilotti, C Marini, S Cirillo, V Marra, L Martincich, A Contegiacomo, M Pensabene, I Capuano, G B Burgazzi, A Petrillo, L Bonomo, A Carriero, R Mariani-Costantini, P Battista, A Cama, G Palca, C Di Maggio, E D'Andrea, M Bazzocchi, G E Francescutti, C Zuiani, V Londero, I Zunnui, C Gustavino, M G Centurioni, A Iozzelli, P Panizza, A Del Maschio.   

Abstract

This report presents the preliminary results of the first phase (21 months) of a multi-centre, non-randomised, prospective study, aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), X-ray mammography (XM) and ultrasound (US) in early diagnosis of breast cancer (BC) in subjects at high genetic risk. This Italian national trial (coordinated by the Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome) so far recruited 105 women (mean age 46.0 years; median age 51.0; age range 25-77 years), who were either proven BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers or had a 1 in 2 probability of being carriers (40/105 with a previous personal history of BC). Eight cases of breast carcinomas were detected in the trial (mean age 55.3 years, median age 52.5; age range 35-70 years; five with previous personal history of BC). All trial-detected BC cases (8/8) were identified by MRI, while XM and US correctly classified only one. MRI had one false positive case, XM and US none. Seven "MRI-only" detected cancers (4 invasive, 3 in situ) occurred in both pre- (n = 2) and post-menopausal (n = 5) women. With respect to the current XM screening programmes addressed to women in the age range 50-69 years, the global incidence of BC in the trial (7.6%) was over ten-fold higher. The cost per "MRI-only" detected cancer in this particular category of subjects at high genetic risk was substantially lower than that of an XM-detected cancer in the general women population. These preliminary results confirmed that MRI is a very useful tool to screen subjects at high genetic risk for breast carcinoma, not only in pre-, but also in post-menopausal age, with a low probability of false positive cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12585665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 0392-9078


  26 in total

1.  Detection of non-palpable breast cancer in asymptomatic women by using unenhanced diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted MR imaging: comparison with mammography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Hidetake Yabuuchi; Yoshio Matsuo; Shunya Sunami; Takeshi Kamitani; Satoshi Kawanami; Taro Setoguchi; Shuji Sakai; Masamitsu Hatakenaka; Makoto Kubo; Eriko Tokunaga; Hidetaka Yamamoto; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Incorporating new imaging models in breast cancer management.

Authors:  Denise H Reddy; Ellen B Mendelson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2005-03

3.  Breast MRI in community practice: equipment and imaging techniques at facilities in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Authors:  Wendy B DeMartini; Laura Ichikawa; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Diana Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Berta Geller; Tracy Onega; Robert D Rosenberg; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Imaging studies for the early detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Ingrid Schreer; Walter Heindel; Alexander Katalinic
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Breast magnetic resonance imaging: are those who need it getting it?

Authors:  S Tan; J David; L Lalonde; M El Khoury; M Labelle; R Younan; E Patocskai; J Richard; I Trop
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 6.  State of the art of current modalities for the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Authors:  Cosimo Di Maggio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Katrina Armstrong; Constance D Lehman; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  [Value of breast MRI as supplement to mammography and sonography for high risk breast cancer patients].

Authors:  T Schlossbauer; K Hellerhoff; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  Multimodality screening of high-risk women: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Susan P Weinstein; A Russell Localio; Emily F Conant; Mark Rosen; Kathleen M Thomas; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Breast cancer in Kurdish women of northern Iraq: incidence, clinical stage, and case control analysis of parity and family risk.

Authors:  Runnak A Majid; Hazha A Mohammed; Heshu M Saeed; Banaz M Safar; Rekawt M Rashid; Michael D Hughson
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.