Rena R Wing1, Robert W Jeffery. 1. Weight Control and Diabetes Research Center, Brown Medical School/The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island. rwing@lifespan.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Research on long-term maintenance of weight loss is hampered by the fact that relapse typically does not occur until after 6 months. We sought to determine whether relapses could be induced earlier by intentionally interrupting the momentum of weight loss during a treatment program and thus provide a model for weight maintenance research. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Subjects (N = 142) were recruited at two centers and randomly assigned to a control group, a long break group (LB), or a short break group (SB). The control group received a standard behavioral weight loss program with 14 weekly sessions; the LB and SB groups received the same. However, the LB group took a 6-week break after lesson 7, and the SB group took a 2-week break after lessons 3, 6, and 9. Participants were instructed to stop all weight loss efforts during breaks. RESULTS: Participants seemed to take breaks as prescribed, with interruptions in self-monitoring, dietary adherence, and self-weighing (but not in exercise). However, participants quickly resumed these behaviors after the break. Breaks produced a slowing of weight loss or slight regain, but weight losses during the breaks were not significantly different from the control group. Importantly, overall weight losses (0 to 5 months or 0 to 11 months) did not differ between conditions. DISCUSSION: This study was not successful in developing a method to experimentally produce weight loss relapses. However, the finding that prescribed breaks do not have adverse effects may have clinical application.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Research on long-term maintenance of weight loss is hampered by the fact that relapse typically does not occur until after 6 months. We sought to determine whether relapses could be induced earlier by intentionally interrupting the momentum of weight loss during a treatment program and thus provide a model for weight maintenance research. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Subjects (N = 142) were recruited at two centers and randomly assigned to a control group, a long break group (LB), or a short break group (SB). The control group received a standard behavioral weight loss program with 14 weekly sessions; the LB and SB groups received the same. However, the LB group took a 6-week break after lesson 7, and the SB group took a 2-week break after lessons 3, 6, and 9. Participants were instructed to stop all weight loss efforts during breaks. RESULTS:Participants seemed to take breaks as prescribed, with interruptions in self-monitoring, dietary adherence, and self-weighing (but not in exercise). However, participants quickly resumed these behaviors after the break. Breaks produced a slowing of weight loss or slight regain, but weight losses during the breaks were not significantly different from the control group. Importantly, overall weight losses (0 to 5 months or 0 to 11 months) did not differ between conditions. DISCUSSION: This study was not successful in developing a method to experimentally produce weight loss relapses. However, the finding that prescribed breaks do not have adverse effects may have clinical application.
Authors: Sherri L Pals; David M Murray; Catherine M Alfano; William R Shadish; Peter J Hannan; William L Baker Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-06-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jacqueline F Hayes; Deborah F Tate; Mark A Espeland; Jessica Gokee LaRose; Amy A Gorin; Cora E Lewis; Elissa Jelalian; Judy Bahnson; Rena R Wing Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2021-09-21 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Nancy E Sherwood; Meghan L Butryn; Evan M Forman; Daniel Almirall; Elisabeth M Seburg; A Lauren Crain; Alicia S Kunin-Batson; Marcia G Hayes; Rona L Levy; Robert W Jeffery Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2016-01-26 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Radhika V Seimon; Yan-Chuan Shi; Katy Slack; Kailun Lee; Hamish A Fernando; Amy D Nguyen; Lei Zhang; Shu Lin; Ronaldo F Enriquez; Jackie Lau; Herbert Herzog; Amanda Sainsbury Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-01-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Gareth R Dutton; Marissa A Gowey; Fei Tan; Dali Zhou; Jamy Ard; Michael G Perri; Cora E Lewis Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2017-08-15 Impact factor: 6.457