Literature DB >> 12581681

Prognostic value of ST-segment resolution-when and what to measure.

Per Johanson1, Tomas Jernberg, Gunnar Gunnarsson, Bertil Lindahl, Lars Wallentin, Mikael Dellborg.   

Abstract

AIMS: Analyses of ST-segment resolution during acute myocardial infarction has, during recent years, challenged coronary angiography as gold-standard for predicting myocardial reflow and future risk. We have previously reported that continuous ST-monitoring can be done accurately in the clinical setting. We now set out to compare the prognostic value of previously suggested cut-offs for ST-segment resolution, and determine the times to measure these. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We analysed 752 patients with ST-elevation infarction, from the second Assessment of Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic (ASSENT 2) and ASSENT-PLUS studies, either with vectorcardiography or continuous 12-lead ST-monitoring. All analyses were made blindly by two independent observers. Times to 20, 30, 50 and 70% ST-segment resolution were examined in relation to 30-day mortality.The optimal cut-off for ST-segment resolution analyses was found to be 50%, measured at 60 min. We could hereby identify a large low-risk group, 40% of the population, with only 1.4% 30-day mortality. Furthermore, 88% of deaths were correctly predicted within 1h of observation and treatment.
CONCLUSION: Continuous ST-monitoring of patients with acute myocardial infarction yields important prognostic information after 60 min of observation and should be used for very early-risk stratification in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12581681     DOI: 10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00739-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  6 in total

Review 1.  ST-segment monitoring in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Per Johanson; Galen S Wagner; Mikael Dellborg; Mitchell W Krucoff
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  [Prediction of outcome in ST elevation myocardial infarction by the extent of ST segment deviation recovery. Which method is best?].

Authors:  K Schröder; U Zeymer; W Wegschneider; R Schröder
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2004-08

3.  Predicting recovery of myocardial function by electrocardiography after acute infarction.

Authors:  Minna M Kylmälä; Teijo Konttila; Paula Vesterinen; Mats Lindholm; Heikki Väänänen; Matti Stenroos; Markku S Nieminen; Helena Hänninen; Lauri Toivonen
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Admission N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and its interaction with admission troponin T and ST segment resolution for early risk stratification in ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  E Björklund; T Jernberg; P Johanson; P Venge; M Dellborg; L Wallentin; B Lindahl
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Early versus late ST-segment resolution and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H B van der Zwaan; M G Stoel; J W Roos-Hesselink; G Veen; E Boersma; C von Birgelen
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 6.  Postconditioning in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  M Abdelnoor; I Sandven; S Limalanathan; J Eritsland
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2014-08-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.