Literature DB >> 12581054

Oncology service correspondence: do we communicate?

S Babington1, C Wynne, C H Atkinson, B E Hickey, A S Abdelaal.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the content of letters sent from a hospital oncology service regarding the initial assessment of new referrals and the requirements of hospital specialists and General Practitioners (GPs) regarding oncology service correspondence. The content of letters regarding the initial consultation of 204 consecutive new oncology patients was analysed. General Practitioners and referring specialists were sent a 13-point survey to gauge their preferences for the information contained in oncology correspondence pertaining to the initial assessment of an oncology patient. Seventy-two percent of the patients had a letter written following their initial oncology assessment. The GP received a copy of 81% of the letters (58% of the study sample). The diagnosis was recorded in all our letters, and the proposed treatment plan was addressed in 84% of our letters. Both GPs and specialists required information on examination and investigation findings, diagnosis, treatment options, proposed management plan, and what the patient was told. The GPs required further information on current medication, likely side-effects of the proposed management, and clarification of when to contact the oncologist. The majority of the respondents were in favour of a structured letter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12581054     DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1673.2003.01129.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Radiol        ISSN: 0004-8461


  4 in total

1.  Valued Components of a Consultant Letter from Referring Physicians' Perspective: a Systematic Literature Synthesis.

Authors:  Arjun H Rash; Robert Sheldon; Maoliosa Donald; Cindy Eronmwon; Vikas P Kuriachan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  The primary care provider (PCP)-cancer specialist relationship: A systematic review and mixed-methods meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Lesly A Dossett; Janella N Hudson; Arden M Morris; M Catherine Lee; Richard G Roetzheim; Michael D Fetters; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Outcome progress letter types: parent and physician preferences for letters from pediatric mental health services.

Authors:  Patricia Lingley-Pottie; Teresa Janz; Patrick J McGrath; Charles Cunningham; Cathy MacLean
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  Enhancing continuity of information: essential components of consultation reports.

Authors:  Whitney Berta; Jan Barnsley; Jeff Bloom; Rhonda Cockerill; Dave Davis; Liisa Jaakkimainen; Anne Marie Mior; Yves Talbot; Eugene Vayda
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.275

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.