Literature DB >> 12579478

Superiority of bilateral cochlear implantation over unilateral cochlear implantation in tone discrimination in chinese patients.

Dennis Kin-Kwok Au1, Yau Hui, William Ignace Wei.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The benefits of bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) versus unilateral CIs were evaluated by comparing the Cantonese lexical tone discrimination scores conducted in a quiet environment and against a background noise.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four postlingually deafened Cantonese-speaking adults (2 men and 2 women) with bilateral CIs were included in this study. The subjects were their own control in the monaural hearing condition. Both the Cantonese lexical tone stimuli and the speech-weighted background noise were presented at 0(0) azimuth and at a distance of 1 m from the subject. The speech stimuli, which were maintained at 65 dB sound pressure level, were presented in both a quiet environment and against a background noise at signal to noise ratios (SNRs) of +15, +10, +5, 0, -5, -10, and -15.
RESULTS: Against a background noise, the bilateral CIs required +5 dB SNR only to obtain significant scores in discriminating Cantonese lexical tones and to achieve discrimination scores that were comparable to the optimal discrimination scores obtained in quiet. No significant difference in the discrimination scores was observed between binaural and monaural hearing conditions when the tests were conducted in quiet.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that in the presence of background noise, bilateral CIs were better than unilateral CIs in discriminating Cantonese lexical tones. Copyright 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12579478     DOI: 10.1053/ajot.2003.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0196-0709            Impact factor:   1.808


  7 in total

1.  Statistical bias in the assessment of binaural benefit relative to the better ear.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  MED-EL Cochlear implants: state of the art and a glimpse into the future.

Authors:  Ingeborg Hochmair; Peter Nopp; Claude Jolly; Marcus Schmidt; Hansjörg Schösser; Carolyn Garnham; Ilona Anderson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-12

Review 3.  [Bilateral cochlear implants].

Authors:  J Müller
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a multicenter clinical study.

Authors:  Ruth Litovsky; Aaron Parkinson; Jennifer Arcaroli; Carol Sammeth
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  The effect of reducing the number of electrodes on spatial hearing tasks for bilateral cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Ann Perreau; Richard S Tyler; Shelley A Witt
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Design and fabrication of multichannel cochlear implants for animal research.

Authors:  Stephen J Rebscher; Alexander M Hetherington; Russell L Snyder; Patricia A Leake; Ben H Bonham
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Bilateral cochlear implantation for children in nagasaki, Japan.

Authors:  Yukihiko Kanda; Hidetaka Kumagami; Minoru Hara; Yuzuru Sainoo; Chisei Sato; Tomomi Yamamoto-Fukuda; Haruo Yoshida; Akiko Ito; Chiharu Tanaka; Kyoko Baba; Ayaka Nakata; Hideo Tanaka; Haruo Takahashi
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.372

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.