Literature DB >> 12578284

Weight reference charts for British long-term breastfed infants.

T J Cole1, A A Paul, R G Whitehead.   

Abstract

AIM: To produce a modification of the British 1990 weight reference reflecting the growth of long-term breastfed infants.
METHODS: 120 infants from the Cambridge Infant Growth Study fed breast milk (with no formula) for at least 24 wk, with solids introduced at a mean age of 15 wk, were weighed every 4 wk from birth to 52 wk. Weights were converted to standard deviation scores (SDS) for gender and age post-term based on the revised British 1990 reference, averaged and smoothed across age, and then converted back to weights to provide modified median weight curves by gender. Other centile curves were constructed assuming the same variability and skewness by age as for the British reference.
RESULTS: Long-term breastfed infants were slightly heavier than the reference at birth and crossed centiles upwards to reach +0.3 SDS at 2 mo, but subsequently crossed centiles downwards to -0.2 SDS by 12 mo.
CONCLUSION: The British 1990 reference, although better than previous growth standards, reflects the growth of long-term breastfed infants only imperfectly, with mean weight falling by 0.5 SDS from 2 to 12 mo. The provision of breastfeeding-specific centiles, either as a transparent overlay or as an alternative chart, should be useful for professionals and parents to monitor the weight of long-term breastfed infants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12578284     DOI: 10.1080/08035250216095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Paediatr        ISSN: 0803-5253            Impact factor:   2.299


  8 in total

1.  Growth charts for babies.

Authors:  Charlotte M Wright
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-18

2.  Breast feeding method should ensure rapid weight gain.

Authors:  C A Walshaw; J Owens
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 3.  Weight monitoring of breastfed babies in the UK - centile charts, scales and weighing frequency.

Authors:  Magda Sachs; Fiona Dykes; Bernie Carter
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  The prevalence of wasting in Czech infants: a comparison of the WHO child growth standards and the Czech growth references.

Authors:  Jana Vignerová; Markéta Paulová; Lenka H Shriver; Jitka Riedlová; Dagmar Schneidrová; Eva Kudlová; Lída Lhotská
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  The 2017 Korean National Growth Charts for children and adolescents: development, improvement, and prospects.

Authors:  Jae Hyun Kim; Sungha Yun; Seung-Sik Hwang; Jung Ok Shim; Hyun Wook Chae; Yeoun Joo Lee; Ji Hyuk Lee; Soon Chul Kim; Dohee Lim; Sei Won Yang; Kyungwon Oh; Jin Soo Moon
Journal:  Korean J Pediatr       Date:  2018-05-28

6.  Modelling predictive gender- and gestation-specific weight reference centiles for preterm infants using a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  W John Watkins; Daniel Farewell; Sujoy Banerjee; Hesham Nasef; Anitha James; Mallinath Chakraborty
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Growth in Exclusively Breastfed and Non-exclusively Breastfed Children: Comparisons with WHO Child Growth Standards and Korean National Growth Charts.

Authors:  Sinyoung Kang; Seung Won Lee; Hye Ryeong Cha; Shin-Hye Kim; Man Yong Han; Mi Jung Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Breastfeeding, introduction of other foods and effects on health: a systematic literature review for the 5th Nordic Nutrition Recommendations.

Authors:  Agneta Hörnell; Hanna Lagström; Britt Lande; Inga Thorsdottir
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.894

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.